Have the liberals in the House read Stupak's executive order?
LeftyAndProud60
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:34 PM
Original message |
Have the liberals in the House read Stupak's executive order? |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 01:36 PM by LeftyAndProud60
Why would the white house let him write anything?
MSNBC make it sound like he wrote what he wanted Obama to do and white house lawyers approved it.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The executive order will do nothing more than "clarify" that the Hyde amendment will be |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-21-10 01:37 PM by jenmito
what the health care contains or goes by.
|
denimgirly
(929 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Let's hope you're right... |
|
Stupak is salivating he has a chance to do anything,.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Luke Russert just reported that. n/t |
denimgirly
(929 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Curious: Why doesnt a Public Option get an Executive Order too? |
Diamonique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I think it's because of the money. |
|
A public option has to involve federal funds, which must be passed by Congress.
|
gimama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Welcome toDU!:hi:
Now..how's about an ANSWER?!
|
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
One is for what to commit spending on, the other is for what not to spend money on. The latter is always acceptable, while the former is not.
|
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. One - a reiteration of a law in effect for 30 years; the other a major |
|
policy item, that needs definition and funding.
|
ncteechur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-21-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Actually I think it does two things: it effectively plays both sides |
|
It really does nothing more than uphold the Hyde Amendment
BUT it also gives the President a talking point with pro-life independents.
When the GOP yell that President Obama is pro-abortion, he can simply say that he signed the executive order against.
I think it is smart.
Gives up nothing, gets him some cover.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Jan 04th 2025, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.