|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 05:52 PM Original message |
Now that they were given the free shot by rapublicans to add public option back in, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'd vote for the fix, if I were allowed to vote. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think they did it just to piss you off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Maybe they could have made you a pony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLyellowdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. Procedural FAIL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. can you please cite the rule that makes this "too big for reconciliation"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. 2 U.S.C. § 644, aka the Byrd Rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Except it's not extraneous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-26-10 05:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Your fight is not with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PolNewf (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. You are asking for backlash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. identify the 216 votes in the House for a PO version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-26-10 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
12. we have 2010 and 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-26-10 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
13. Harkin and Sanders planning on second reconciliation, PO amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC