Ending a year of sometimes topsy-turvy negotiations, Mr. Obama and President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia sealed the deal in a morning telephone call, confirming resolution of the last outstanding details. They then announced they will fly to Prague to sign the treaty on April 8 in a ceremony designed to showcase improved relations between the two countries.
<snip>
Mrs. Clinton said that she did not anticipate any trouble getting the agreement ratified by the Senate, noting that arms control agreements in the past have sailed through. And, in a moment of levity, she joked that the Obama administration would be happy to help the Russian government get the treaty through the Duma.
“President Obama has said that he will send Rahm Emanuel to Moscow” to help out, she said, laughing, referring to Mr. Obama’s bulldog chief of staff. “We all endorsed that offer.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/27/world/europe/27start.html?src=meI think the Daily Kos article is more accurate on the difficulty of getting Senate confirmation. Is there any substantive piece of legislation that has passed with 67 plus votes? Where Kerry and Lugar have done a fantastic job of making good cases for legislation this year, this is nowhere as easy as Clinton suggests. The fact is that the initial treaty was signed under Bush, after Reagan started the negotiations and then an update was passed under Bush. Now, as Democrats have favored reducing nuclear weapons, it seems that these treaties are far easier to pass under a Republican President, who Republicans want to support. I wonder if the idea was to sound unconcerned because that might make it easier. But if this passes, it will likely need the legislative skills of Kerry and Lugar and lots of administration support.