think the republicans are doing them any favors when they vote against HCR, unemployment assistance, new jobs bills? Someone's been really good at selling them a load of crap, so I guess props to faux and its minions. Oh, and this makes my head hurt.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28teaparty.html?hpwWith No Jobs, Plenty of Time for Tea Party
Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Tea Party supporters rallied Saturday in Searchlight, Nev., Senator Harry Reid’s hometown.
By KATE ZERNIKE
Published: March 27, 2010
SOUTH BEND, Ind. —
When Tom Grimes lost his job as a financial consultant 15 months ago, he called his congressman, a Democrat, for help getting government health care.Then he found a new full-time occupation: Tea Party activist.
In the last year, he has organized a local group and a statewide coalition, and even started a “bus czar” Web site to marshal protesters to Washington on short notice.
This month, he mobilized 200 other Tea Party activists to go to the local office of the same congressman to protest what he sees as the government’s takeover of health care.Mr. Grimes is one of many Tea Party members jolted into action by economic distress. At rallies, gatherings and training sessions in recent months, activists often tell a similar story in interviews: they had lost their jobs, or perhaps watched their homes plummet in value, and they found common cause in the Tea Party’s fight for lower taxes and smaller government.
The Great Depression, too, mobilized many middle-class people who had fallen on hard times. Though, as Michael Kazin, the author of “The Populist Persuasion,” notes, they tended to push for more government involvement. The Tea Party vehemently wants less — though a number of its members acknowledge that they are relying on government programs for help.
Mr. Grimes, who receives Social Security, has filled the back seat of his Mercury Grand Marquis with the literature of the movement,
including Glenn Beck’s “Arguing With Idiots” and Frederic Bastiat’s “The Law,” which denounces public benefits as “false philanthropy.”
“If you quit giving people that stuff, they would figure out how to do it on their own,” Mr. Grimes said.
(ME: This is the same Mr. Grimes who receives Social Security, the same guy who's being given 'stuff'. How come he can't see the hypocrisy?)
more...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28teaparty.html?hpw