|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
argonaut
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:17 PM Original message |
Rank the Democratic Presidents since FDR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demosincebirth
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. LBJ. Truman, Kennedy, BC, JC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Carter, Clinton, Kennedy, Truman, Johnson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. LOL. Almost my opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. I would make one quibble which is that I would put LBJ ahead of JFK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. Truman was the last President that was accessible to the American people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Codger
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. HST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. Truman, JFK, Jimmy Carter, LBJ and Bill Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. LBJ, Obama, Truman, JFK, Carter, and Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think Obama would have ordered an air strike over Cuba in 1962 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. To the contrary I think Obama would've done the exact same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Obama's record tells me otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. That's just incorrect. 2 weeks before the assasination JFK allowed for Ngo to be killed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. That was never part of the plan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Oh come on. JFK knew because the generals consulted him before the coup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. The advisors in South Vietnam were strictly in non-combat positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. That's what their job title said but do you really think that they didn't try to shoot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:34 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Shooting in self-defense was always allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. You just said they were non combat last time I checked shooting was combat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. When someone is shooting at you, normal reaction is to shoot back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Maybe so but they helped ARVN go on the offensive. Just like the USSR helped the North Koreans in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. "Obama has been too differential to the Pentagon brass"? Um, he rejected Gen. McChrystal's advice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Obama: I'm looking forward to returning to Afghanistan many times in the years to come. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. So what? Did you forget about the July 2011 timeline for Afghanistan withdrawal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. 'Conditions-based' is a loophole big enough to fly a jumbo jet throught it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. "Conditions-based" is realistic. So far, the timeline is still on schedule. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. His Afghan escalation really hammers that point home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. JFK did not have the CIA bring Al Qaeda Chechens to fight in Kosovo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 10:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. Let's just say some of us Haitians were happy Aristide is out! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
44. A couple of years ago I read "The Missile Crisis" by Elie Abel and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Truman/Johnson.... Carter/Kennedy/Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Kennedy is head and shoulders over Carter and Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. "after being burned by Bay of Pigs" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why not include Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. No one has any kind of real perspective to judge his presidency and its longer term effects by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. The Democratic Party of today is not the one from our parents and grandparents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
20. Carter, Johnson, Truman, Kennedy, Clinton. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
36. Johnson, Truman, Clinton, Carter, Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
38. Great discussion question, and a difficult one to answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
39. If we're going to include Kennedy, we can include Pres. Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioBlue
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
40. mine: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
41. Kennedy, Johnson, Truman & Carter tied for third, Clinton fifth place. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:14 AM Response to Original message |
43. JFK wasn't president long enough to qualify as best of the list provided. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC