|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:48 AM Original message |
My thoughts on Anwar al-Awlak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. The president shreds the Constitution and you want to victim to defend himself in the news? Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Which President? Lincoln? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. You see no difference between a WAR and ordering civilians killed without any oversight? There is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. Are you disputing the assertion that Al Qaeda is at war with us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. If you want to play semantics games, note that "war" is only waged against a state, and can only... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Since when has the term war been used to describe only conflicts between states? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Always, legally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 02:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. In that case, we've not been in a single war since WW2. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. War isn't declared anymore by any state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. We're talking about legal matters here. That is the legal definition of war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. The President didn't kill anybody. Nor did he order anyone killed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. If he did not order anyone killed what is this thread about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:04 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. President (IF these accounts are true) is basically saying that Awlaki isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:08 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. You deny the truth of the the thing and then justify it? Please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. What truth have I denied? "Capture or kill" is pretty much our policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #21 |
51. (IF these accounts are true) is only NOT a denial in Glen Beck's world. 'foreign terror suspects' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #13 |
30. You're seeing what I was seeing added to that...the ACLU seems to want to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
43. So if we LABEL a person "a terrorist" it's OK to kill them outright? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. Well put. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. I'm generally a fan of Obama but I don't like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's the heart of the matter and I don't have an easy answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Wanted, dead or alive. Dead is only an option if alive can't be achieved, presumably. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
25. If that were the case, wouldn't the saying be "Wanted: Alive or Dead"? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:31 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I dunno--Dead or Alive just sounds more bad-ass, maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. what's stopping a future administration from going further and targeting someone who may be innocent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Impeachment? There is little to stop a President from committing crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well, here's a first, Maverick - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. stranger things have happened, and I agree should be allowed to turn himself in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
9. Just Google "Al Qaeda leader captured" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Has that quest to capture OBL going? Beyond that most of the early successes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
24. They aren't "my guidelines" they're in the US Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. "...if we can find them to kill them, we can find them to capture them. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
15. How can an infallible man fail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Your post was certainly lacking in intellectual honesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I didn't attack you. I applaud you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. just more of the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
20. Article III Section 3 is instructive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Deleted message |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. You have to remember what the framers were doing with section |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I know they were trying to stop abuses such as the Star Court common in a monarchy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
26. Good points. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
29. What is the list and how long has it existed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I used the term list in the loosest sense of the word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. And if your next door neighbor was a "terrorist," you wouldn't mind if the Drone KILLED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. You've taken it pretty far here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 09:25 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Yes, probably but I don't have all the facts, neither do you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
35. Deleted message |
SpartanDem
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
46. The solution may be to try him in absentia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Thu Apr-08-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. That may not be such a bad idea. It would seem to resolve all the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 09:29 AM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Yes, and while we're at it, let's snatch up Chalabi in Iraq and send him back to Jordan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC