Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton for Supreme Court? White House Says 'No'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 02:01 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton for Supreme Court? White House Says 'No'
Hillary Clinton for Supreme Court? White House Says 'No'
Speculation About Clinton Among Potential High-Court Nominees

56 comments By DEVIN DWYER
April 12, 2010

Could Secretary of State Hillary Clinton really be in the mix to don a black robe on the bench of the nation's highest court?

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she's 'hopeful for a smooth transition.'The White House says the answer is "no," despite all the chatter in Washington today.

"The President thinks Secretary Clinton is doing an excellent job as secretary of state and wants her to remain in that position," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said.

The comments come after Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, created a stir earlier today when he told NBC's "Today" show that he believed Clinton was among the possible candidates to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.

"I even heard the name Hillary Clinton today," Hatch said. "That would be an interesting person in the mix."

President Obama is said to be actively reviewing the credentials of at least 10 potential candidates to fill Stevens' soon-to-be vacant seat, and some had speculated Clinton could be among them.

<SNIP>

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/hillary-clinton-potential-supreme-court-nominees/story?id=10351293
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. 10 years ago she would have been a great choice
now I fear she is too old. With the republicans appointing very young men, there is little room for an older appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Orrin Hatch just wants a fight among the attack dogs on both sides, and HRC is red meat...
Just a little something we should all keep in mind. There is no other reason for a Repub like Orrin to even mention Hillary Clinton's name.

I actually have a great deal of confidence in President Obama's ability to pick someone for the Court -- a person who can get things accomplished, and one of the oft-overlooked ways getting things accomplished happens is by a person who has good interpersonal skills. It will be interesting to see who he comes up with.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He is really trying to start an internal Dem fight
don't take the bait. If she wanted it, im sure sure would be an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. She would certainly be an option.
The woman is sharper than a glass knife. I have absolutely no doubt she'd adopt the spirit and letter of The Constitution as naturally as leaves adopt the wind.

But right now, she's kicking ass for us globally. I'm way for that right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. She has no experience as a judge
Which would make for a weak nomination. While she may have the character for the role, she is not an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's not too old.
But she is too valuable in her current role to spare her. I agree wholeheartedly with the President here: leave Mrs Clinton at State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hell Yes, Dr.
Keep her where she can do the most good... for now.

SCJ would still be an excellent option post 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't listen to orrin hatched as to what
time of day it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well...
considering you'd have to wake him up just to ask, I can understand the reservation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Not only no, but HELL NO!
Hillary Clinton is doing a FAN-FREAKIN'-TASTIC job as SecState, and we need her to continue in this vital role. Who else would have been able to pull off getting 46 other heads of State together in one place besides the former First Lady? She looks like she's enjoying herself immensely. So no, I don't want her to be nominated to SCOTUS. I think that she would be an excellent justice, but she's doing such a good job that I don't want her to leave State!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. She's too good at her current job--we can't afford to lose her, especially not in the middle
of the START treaty fight with the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC