Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tea Party Movement Spreads To Military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:57 PM
Original message
Tea Party Movement Spreads To Military

Tea Party Movement Spreads To Military

Zachary Roth

The Tea Party movement has gained a foothold in the armed forces.

A new Tea Party group, Armed Forces Tea Party Patriots, has grown quickly since being launched last month by an active duty Marine Corps sergeant. The group, which vows to "stand up on the very soil we defended to preserve common sense conservatism and defend our Constitution that is threatened by a tyrannical government," currently has over 400 members, who have signed up through its Facebook page, though many are not active duty military. And it has close ties to the broader Tea Party movement.

"People in the military need to be heard," the group's prime organizer, Gary Stein -- a Marine Corps sergeant stationed at Camp Pendleton in southern California -- told TPMmuckraker in an interview. "Our opinions do count."

<...>

Stein's political activism seems to have raised some concern among his superiors. Late last March, he wrote online: "Was just told by a Marine Corps Officer to watch what I say about Obama... I think not..." And later that same day: "I was just told to keep my opinons (sic) to myself about Obama, by my Officer-in-Charge (OIC)."

Indeed, Stein may be violating military policies that restrict political statements and activities by active duty personnel. "I've seen military command go against people on a lot less," Mike Lebowitz, a former JAG lawyer who's an expert on issues of military expression, told TPMmuckraker. Lebowitz said one key question is whether the activity is judged to be "partisan." Though the Tea Party movement has formed political parties in a few states, and has endorsed and supported candidates in some races, there's no evidence that Stein's group has done so.

more

:wtf:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. They better be careful...
about how they talk about their Commander in Chief... just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I hope they're NOT careful and get kicked out...
purge them from the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Dishonorable discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yup. I hope they ALL get that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. Too difficult. Do what they did to returning Viet Vets. Give them a
general discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. If this infection in the body politic isn't dealt with clearly and unambiguously...
...well, let's just say the country can't really weather further "sepsis..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think this constitutes grounds for a dishonorable discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. We have a Fifth Column in this country
and any active duty serviceman had not dare better utter critical remarks of their commander in chief.

A court martial will be slapped on their ass faster than they can say Leavenworth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Send him to combat duty in Afghanista, that might shut him up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7.  Doesn't the military take an oath when
they are inducted to serve under the current CIC?..or something to that effect?

No one ever said they can't be heard but they're showing their hate and ignorance..Obama was elected by a margin of 11 Million People and every law has been voted on in Congress.

So where the fuck do they get their information from ..that they're being railroaded? Do they not know that elections have consequences? We knew this wouldn't be easy but JHC! The ignorance fed by hate radio & fauxsn00ze is killing brain cells.

We hear the bad news..about 400 of these traitors and growing..wonder what the number is of those who aren't ignorant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yes, but our Active/Reserve Duty oath requires us to " ... defend the Constitution ...
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 08:33 PM by ShortnFiery
against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

The teabaggers' interpretations are a little different than ours. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. couple of pictures anti- commander and chief
seems to be a bit of a line crossed there imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. This is where the hypocrisy sets in
"stand up on the very soil we defended to preserve common sense conservatism and defend our Constitution that is threatened by a tyrannical government,"

During Bush's two terms, the media never failed to make an issue about the status of soldiers questioning administration policy.

CBS fired a retired General (John Batiste) for criticizing Bush.

Where is the outrage now?

In what alternate universe is it possible for an active duty soldier to be linked to this group?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. SGT Stein probably ekes by because he's a "Non-Commissioned" vice "Commissioned" Officer.
IMO, the Officer Corps would not tolerate a leader in this group but sometimes NCOs are not held to as high a standard.

Still an NCO is "a leader" and it is IMO, conduct unbecoming to criticize the Commander-In-Chief in an open, public forum.

UCMJ provision is Article 88, which makes it a crime for an officer to use contemptuous words against the president, the vice president, Congress, the secretary of defense, the secretary of a military department, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, or the governor or legislature of any state, territory, commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xsquid Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. No sometimes about it, NCO's are not officers they are
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 10:41 PM by xsquid
enlisted. Calling them Non Commissioned Officers does not make them an officer as per the UCMJ and they are not covered under article 88.

I did 12 years USN, the last several as a master at arms (navy shipboard cop) and wrote up all of the cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsstranger Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. Common sense conservatism??????????????
WTF is that? Is that anything like the bullshit "compassionate conservatism" that AWOLBush tried to claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Time to institute DADT - Don't Ask, Don't Teabag.
These dangerous idiots will be coddled by the military, while gay service members with impeccable records will be ousted.

USA! USA! ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Soldiers are trained to carry out orders from their CIVILIAN CinC
If that isn't to their liking, they can STFU, resign or go AWOL and face a court martial.

That's the way the Armed forces work in America and that's how it's ALWAYS worked..

And God help us if that WASN'T the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. "...400...many not active duty..."
Sounds like a few fools - who may end up getting the boot if they're not careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thank the media for this. They are the ones doing the non-stop reporting
on this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. I agree. I have no idea why cable news is trying to "mainstream" these fringe views
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. We are doing it too. count how many Teabagger treads at DU
right now, and see what I mean. I'm not sure if we are helping ourselves,
by constantly talking about them, instead of talking about our own agenda.
It's starting to appear like we are helping grow this movement....at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. DU understands they have fringe views. The number of threads is in response to the media elevation
At least that is my take on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. I LOVE the confluence of these articles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
20. Can Someone Explain To Me How Obama's Government Is Tyrannical?
They keep using that phrase without any evidence. Obama and the Dems won huge elections in 2006 and 2008, and they enacted laws based on what they campaigned for. The Senate and the House had open votes on the HCR law.

So, where is this "tyranny" that they keep crying about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Because they create new definitions for words, like Bush did.
They think that it means that an uppity boy is in the White House. He could not have gotten there by any reasonable means, because they *know* that's not possible.

Obama has usurped what is rightfully white and decent, therefore he didn't do it fairly and *constitutionally.*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
srf Rantz Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. my reactions exactly, it drives me crazy
and they keep using it without any explanation either.

day after day, in article after article, repeated over and over.

no one in the media ever asks them what they mean either. or calls them on it.

it simply exists in their minds and the constant repetition spreads it and embeds it.

The Big Lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. They were saying this shit before he even took office
They're just mad about what a failure GWB was and they've decided to simply take the words liberals used against Bush and say the same about Obama. Other that 'socialist' and a few other left-identifier words, 90% of the words they use apply to GWB.

Simple is as simple does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. When your side wins you have a mandate. When your side loses it's a tyranny.
Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
35. they think if they keep spitting out the word it will stick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. Obama should have any one of these assholes who refuse to follow orders court marshalled.
There should be no tolerance for this shit. If they put deserters in jail under bush they should do the same to these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. If these guys did this under Bush they would have already been disciplined. Believe me, you
don't think Bush/Cheney would except something like this do ya? Why do you think we went to war in Iraq and nobody called them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
27. Scary - do you know if armed services radio still includes Limbaugh et al?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
28. He seems to be calling for a MILITARY COUP in the last paragraph
For Stein, Tea Party activism is a natural offshoot of the military's main mission. "The U.S. military has been around for over 200 years," serving America by deploying to war-zones around the world, he said. "Now its time to do what we need to do to get this country moving in the right direction."

=====

I get the feeling that this guy may want to be discharged, so he can become a martyr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
29. Why not? Christian zealots infiltrated the military long ago. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. common sense conservatism?
Bwahahahahhaa!!!! Those words can not be used together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
37. Once they start railing against the largesse of BIG GUMMITT spending
I'll know irony is dead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC