|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:02 PM Original message |
"There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage." -Kagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Is there one for opposite-sex marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. ah yeh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Loving v Virginia is anti-discrimination, not pro-marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Not exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Thanks...follow up question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. It is a Due Process Clause right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. That's not really a counterexample |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. There is one for marriage, not for opposite-sex OR same-sex marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Did she mean "no enumerated right" or "no right protected by the 9th"? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Marriage is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. How nice of you to repeat a Hannity talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 06:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. but also straight from Obama's SC nominee..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. or opposite sex marriage...so technically she is right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
9. Technically true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. from Repuke lips to your ears to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Do you know the context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. please post a link. such a comment is meaningless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Context and some debate from a GLBT site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Link to the blog post that this is probably referencing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. Marriage is not even mentioned in the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PopSixSquish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Surely You Have Read the Constitution at Some Point? I Think They Still Teach it at "The Institute" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dumpdabaggers (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
22. There is not one for traditonal marriage either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC