Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health care reform: Jindal signs faux nullification bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 09:36 AM
Original message
Health care reform: Jindal signs faux nullification bill

Health care reform: Jindal signs faux nullification bill

by Jed Lewison

Bobby Jindal is mad as hell about health care reform and he wants everybody to know it, so he just signed legislation making it clear that in the State of Louisiana, it's illegal to require individuals to have health insurance. From bill's text (emphasis added):

A. It is hereby declared that the public policy of this state, consistent with our constitutionally recognized and inalienable right of liberty, is that every person within this state is and shall be free from governmental intrusion in choosing or declining to choose any mode of securing health insurance coverage without penalty or threat of penalty.

B. No resident of this state, regardless of whether he has or is eligible for health insurance coverage under any policy or program provided by or through his employer, or a plan sponsored by the state or the federal government, shall be required to obtain or maintain a policy of individual health insurance coverage. The state shall not impose a penalty or fee on any resident of the state for failure to obtain or maintain health insurance coverage.

Sounds like Jindal just struck a blow against the individual responsibility mandate at the heart of health care reform, right? Well, not exactly. Turns out the bill explicitly makes it clear that it is not intended to supersede federal law -- including health care reform.

C. No provision in this Section shall be interpreted or held to supercede any provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, P.L. 111-148 or any other federal law.

So I guess that means by putting his signature on this bill, Bobby Jindal is recognizing the fact that health care reform is now the law of the land? What a faux-nullificationist wimp.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. It sounds like it's just saying that the state will not require you to
buy coverage although the feds will and that the state will not fine or penalize you althought the feds will.

It is farcical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bobby Jindal wants to be prez.
He emotes....and he fabricates. That makes him republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's illegal for people to have health insurance?! Brilliance. To RM with him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. If something is a federal law, HOW CAN
A STATE NULLIFY IT. That's against the Constitution. And illegal. So Jindal by doing this could be considered committing treason. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. no. wrong
First, as the OP points out, the bill doesn't attempt to nullify federal law. It simply is a declaration of what state law is (or isn't). It is, as one other poster correctly stated, "farcical".

Second, even if it was an attempt to override federal law, it wouldn't be "treason". It would be unconstitutional. But if everytime a state legislature (or Congress or the executive branch) passed legislation that was deemed unconstitutional those involved were guilty of treason, then the jails (and graveyards) would be filled to overflowing with legislators and executive branch officials of all parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC