|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
LovinLife (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 01:53 AM Original message |
Obama keeping Bernanke is him playing Chess right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Obama got fucked just by following the last administration, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Silliest response to a post ever.Why does Obama keep Berneke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
47. you really keep basically insisting people should not have voted for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 10:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
54. You are getting totally ridiculous Frenchie, stop now n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
3. Do you even have a vague cliff's notes version of history regarding the Fed and a new President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LovinLife (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Nope. Don't want one. This isn't the change I voted for. Bernanke is clearly pro wall st. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The name of the game is "stability" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. By selling out - the same way Obama decided to refoist Bernanke on us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. What, specifically, is Bernanke and the Fed doing to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. You make it sound so innocent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Bravo.Well put. Innocent indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. The whole point of having a separate entity such as the Fed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. You mean sort of like the banker bailouts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I didn't say it did have the power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:08 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Actually, "Keeping Politics Out of It" is a very meaningful response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Say what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. The Supreme Court was set up to be shielded from political pressure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:39 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Free from political pressure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:47 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. No he was the winner by default. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:56 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. 'Winner by default' lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 04:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. 7/9 said that there was an equal protection argument. The remedy was the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 03:23 AM Response to Reply #21 |
43. Then why did the Supreme Court appoint George Bush president if the Court is supposed to be shielded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:05 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. If you believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. What percentage of TARP was dedicated to the Capital Purchase Program? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 02:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Don't talk sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. The 22 trillion dollars they pledged to the banks no strings attached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Not much of a response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Ok. The Fed is actually the Federal Reserve System |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 03:51 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Go google them, I'm not your admin assistant.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 04:04 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Again, what, specifically, is your beef with the system in place? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 11:12 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I already told you in plain English. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. 22 trillion? man give me a hit of what you're smoking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Watch and listen to Dylan Ratigan, and learn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 09:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
52. absolutely! double+1! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
50. A "jobless recovery" is a misnomer... However, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
33. I dislike the guy. But the stock market actually listens to him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waterscalm (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-07-09 02:54 AM Response to Reply #33 |
56. We are happy little peons when the stock market is happy. joy joy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hatchling (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
34. I don't think he's been playing chess at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. No, not chess. Or Risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iceman66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
38. Maybe he was told to keep Bernanke or else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
39. So this Bernanke is someone we are supposed to hate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-04-09 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. I haven't read the chess analogy in quite a while. It seems the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 07:37 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. It's about time! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
41. this won't end well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
42. Bernanke isn't Geithner and isn't Paulson. He's been one of the best Fed chairmen ever, but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Your viewpoint is accepted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 09:17 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Which is what the banks, not the Fed, did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
45. Must be. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
46. Just protecting the status quo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
48. You can snub it at much as you want...but many on DU you support this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
49. At this point, I've got to say "No, it isn't". Unless, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
55. Says the person who posted an OP titled "Marc Rubio is the GOP Barack Obama" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyond cynical (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-07-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
57. Not really... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-07-09 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
58. Bernanke is a unsung HERO in regards to the steps he took during the financial crisis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC