|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Turborama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:27 AM Original message |
Raw Story Cherry Picked to get a Misleading Headline, Here's What Gen. Wesley Clark Said in Full |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Send this off to the Greatest. General Clark once again reminds me why I supported him for POTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 08:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Same Here (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 10:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. It was on Clark's president's campaign board that I first encountered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Hey Tabatha......those were the days, weren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Gates is not that bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-07-09 01:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
60. I second that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. yes, me too ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 09:12 AM Response to Reply #34 |
50. HI shireen!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D-Lee (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Ditto! Clark's remarks on failed counteries were brilliant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
2. Sound recommendations from a thoughtful man. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
4. Thank you. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
5. Aww geez, couldn't you just condense that down to 3 inflammatory sentences for me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Proof that just because a site is progressive doesn't mean its not full of intentional lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Mee-oww |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
7. I'll listen to Clark over the hysterics on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The BIG mistake is to "adore" any General Officer. We only LIKED "Ike" but some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Is there anyone in the Democratic Party you *do* care for? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Don't change the subject. There are a number of DEMOCRATIC representatives whom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vadawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
33. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. lolz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
11. Great. I supported Clark in 2004 and wish that Obama would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. Dude...everywhere I see the Pres I've been seeing Clark. I was going to ask if he's an advisor. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 08:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:31 AM Response to Reply #39 |
48. I'm talking about now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-07-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Agreed. Yup, he's been sitting in about two meetings so far that I know of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomVilmer (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
12. See a Text version of the Clark PDF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Thanks, I already added a direct link to the PDF in the OP but this text version is very handy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomVilmer (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. How? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Thanks for the tip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
14. Here is a post with links to video of the hearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Wow, that's a great link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. I agree with you on the raw story article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. And, the left media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'm not surprised rawstory has done this before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
21. Ever since a RS editor published a hateful diatribe against atheists, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I remember that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
43. As far as I know, the stupid anti-atheist article was by a columnist, not an editor, and RS also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 04:43 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. whatever. they published it, for what reason? "because they could"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:15 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. If I was editor of Raw Story, I would not have published the piece. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 08:49 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I just chose never to read RS again. I can't tell whether you think I should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. I think that in chastising someone for being factually incorrect, you undermine your argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. The "Drudge-Like" misinformation by some bloggers on the left is troubling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Awe, how quickly some here default to blaming the amorphous "left" is quite REPUBLICAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Sensitive, aren't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. But pro-war agit prop from an "anonymous soldier" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
35. Raw Story is about as credible as Counterpunch. Those who use them as an OP source are idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. self-delete-- not even worth it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. Wes Clark is STILL the man who is my first choice for president of the United States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 01:41 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Hey Stinky, you and me both! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #36 |
52. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Powdered Toast Man (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
38. That's Nothing New. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 10:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. The Huffington Post "do it all the time"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
41. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-05-09 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
44. Thanks SO Much for this, Tubor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
53. Wes Clark is experienced and smart, but above all else he is a good man who loves his country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Yes, we did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
57. does Raw have a forum for feedback? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-06-09 11:25 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Good question..some of us try to contact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC