GOP blocking two of Obama's nominees to the Federal bench because there to liberal

[bigdarryl]

So if the rethugs are ever in charge of the Senate I don't want to hear there whining that democrats are blocking Conservative Judges http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-senate-judge-20100807,0,4462301.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+latimes/news/nationworld/nation+%28L.A.+Times+-+National+News%29

[louis-t]

1. "they're too"

Also, plus.

[davidinalameda]

4. thank you

I didn't want to be the grammar police

[GSLevel9]

10. yes but it stings your eyes when you read something like that. nt

[HCE SuiGeneris]

11. Yes, it does. n/t

[denimgirly]

2. Too Liberal? LOL! At best there very similar to Obama: Center/Leaning Right.

The two are definitely not liberals. They read more like center (with tendencies to lean right).
Obama is clearly no progressive and my guess is he wanted someone similar to himself....mostly down the middle.

[Webster Green]

5. There's no their there.

Sorry, but these threads get routed through an Internets tubular filter, which triggers an alarm to grammar nazis. :P

[nightrain]

12. they're their there.... to two too

[Better Believe It]

3. The Republicans will just for Democrats to filibuster (real ones) or they'll use the "nuclear option

to impose their control over the Senate once they also control the White House.

They play hardball.

Most Democratic Senators throw their hands in the air and surrender to Republican demands.

And they call that governing!

[Lil Missy]

6. "their too" liberal. "their" whining.

[ZM90]

7. Just another example of the obstructionist G.O.B.P.

(Grand Oil Bigots Party)

[Tx4obama]

14. The GOP = The Grumpy Obstructionist Party ;) n/t

[and-justice-for-all]

8. Well Scalia and Roberts are to fucking 'conservative'...

which is equivalent to being fascist.

[kiranon]

9. Or maybe because the Republicans are also racists. n/t

There won't be a minority left that will vote Republican after they insult everyone.

[Tx4obama]

13. There were a total of FIVE (not two) judicial nominees rejected/sent back to the WH Thursday

Liu, Chen, Chatigny, Butler, and McConnell Jr.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8894078

As far as the total number of 'blocked' judicial nominees with 'secret holds' on them the number is SEVERAL DOZEN.