It's not 'infighting', it's not 'lack of support'...

[daleanime]

it's a passionate debate about the direction of our nation.








And that's not a bad thing.O8)

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

1. It goes past "passionate debate" every time someone says "Obama = Bush"

Or comes anywhere close to it.

It also goes past passionate debate when one side absolutely refuses to acknowledge anything good that's done.

[daleanime]

4. I don't like it either...

but that's why it has to be include. You can't deny people the right to free speak just because you don't like/agree with what they say.

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

7. No one is denying any rights.

But that doesn't mean people like Gibbs can't call them out on what they are saying.

[DJ13]

2. And that's not a bad thing.

Apparently the elites who control our country consider it a bad thing, which is why the WH sent Gibbs out to make those statements.

[Uben]

3. As long as it's civil.....

...name calling, and petty accusations do not constitute debate.

[daleanime]

5. It would be a nice start....

:toast:

[kjackson227]

6. It is a lack of support, when debaters clearly state that they're withdrawing support...

because their issues aren't being met fast enough. The discussion/debate is killed at that point.