Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Preparing for a Payroll Tax Holiday?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 09:43 PM
Original message
White House Preparing for a Payroll Tax Holiday?
Edited on Thu Sep-02-10 09:51 PM by babylonsister
White House Preparing for a Payroll Tax Holiday?
By Annie Lowrey 9/2/10 6:35 PM


At The Washington Post, Lori Montgomery has details on a possible White House stimulus plan comprised entirely of tax cuts:

Among the options are a temporary payroll tax holiday and a permanent extension of the research and development tax credit, say people familiar with the talks who spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to describe private deliberations. Permanently extending the research credit would cost roughly $100 billion over the next decade, tax experts said. And depending on its form and duration, a payroll tax holiday could let businesses keep more than $300 billion they would otherwise owe the Treasury.

While significantly less than last year’s $814 billion stimulus package, both ideas would be far more dramatic than anything the White House had been expected to propose.


Economists argue that spending increases tend to be more effective than tax cuts in stimulating the economy. But, the Congressional Budget Office examined (PDF) the effectiveness of a variety of tax cuts this winter, and found payroll tax cuts to be a good option, compared with, say, extending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. Moreover, they have positive impacts on employment — and the sustained high rate of joblessness remains the biggest drag on the American economy and a pressing public-policy issue.

more...

http://washingtonindependent.com/96605/white-house-preparing-for-a-payroll-tax-credit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, this ought to deplete Social Security even further
It's already taking less in than it pays out right now, this should really drive it into the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I believe they are talking about the income tax portion, not the SS contribution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Nope, they are talking about SS, not income tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would be awesome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Seriously, do Tax Cuts ever work? And who is paying for all this?
Geez..enough with the tax cuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This would seriously help those who make minimum wage,
and still have to pay 7.65% of their wages in payroll taxes.

Those kind of tax cuts would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Depends on the tax cut.
A payroll tax holiday will have the most benefit for lower end filers. Capital gains have been getting a free lunch for decades now.

If a holiday needs to be "paid for" let's have a long overdue increase on capital taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. When will we admit that tax cuts are simply bad economic policy.
It has been known for a long while that tax cuts are the least effective form of economic stimulus going, but we keep coming back to them again and again like moths to a flame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Outstanding.
A tax holiday would be a two for one benefit. Direct stimulus to the economy and a boost to political fortunes.

The time for a bold move is right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newthinking Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. So let's choose one of the few forms of stimulus that leaves the unemployed out
Nice bonus for those who are employed. Sure it will add some spending to the economy. But I thought the idea of stimulus was all about jobs, and this is one of the least job producing forms. This would be a freaking bribe for votes with the added effect of further reinforcing bad Republican ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Jobs are created when
people spend money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. It may be a band aid on a hatchet wound but if it can buy the Dems some political capitol....
.... I'll take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is Payroll Tax, not Income Tax.
As noted, it would let businesses keep more than $300 billion they would otherwise owe the Treasury. I don't THINK this would affect workers' paychecks at all, would it?

---------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. not as I understand it
it looks like the whitehouse is once again letting the Republicans dictate policy - in that the repukes would be hard pressed to oppose this, since it is basically a republican plan...


this is just more trickle down economics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. At least the trickling starts a little closer to the people.
But I see what you mean. There's no guarantee business won't just bank the savings to help tide them over when the tax holiday ends. But I guess it might help them meet payroll, keep some people employed.... :shrug:

---------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. will businesses hire more people if no one has the money
to buy their product or service? That seems to be the problem, imo. You need to approach this from the opposite direction - putting money in the hands of people who will spend it. If demand rises, then companies will hire more people to make or provide their product or service to meet that demand.

This proposal is nothing more than election year politicking - an attempt to put Republicans on the hot seat - it will do very little to stimulate the economy, imo.

Why not propose something really big? A new WPA - a new program aimed at rebuilding our infrastructure? The repukes are going to oppose it anyway, so why not go all in? The timidness of the Obama administration is frustrating -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. K & R!
Let the tax cut for the rich expire and pass the payroll tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. This would only help those who have a job
and collect a paycheck. What about those who are collecting a pension/SS/unemployment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Back in 2009, White House should have frozen foreclosures and rolled back interest rates
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 12:20 PM by IndianaGreen
on credit cards.

Right now the White House is like the Captain of the Titanic realizing he didn't have enough lifeboats for the passengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is the payroll tax they are referring to the one that businesses collect from
the employees and then forward it to the government?? So will the corporations stop collecting it from the employees?

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I think it is only the 1/2 the employer pays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Hmmm. So the employer gets their money back, but not the worker
who could actually pour the money back into the economy. Yeap. The business owners will just take a fucking vacation to Europe. Wonderful help to the economies of the nations overseas.

Douches.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Laura Tyson and Mark Zandi were talking about a partial payroll tax on Face the Nation today.
Which probably means this is what the Obama administration is considering. By 'partial' they mean the part the employer pays to the government and it would also be temporary, altho they did not give a time frame. The employer pays 6.2% and the employee pays 6.2% of earnings. The cap for 2010 is $106,800. Above that, no payroll tax is deducted from the employee or paid by the employer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC