Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you don't understand we are in trouble this election you are deluded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:30 PM
Original message
If you don't understand we are in trouble this election you are deluded
I am not saying we are definately losing the House and frankly I think we have very little chance of losing the Senate but we are in some degree of trouble and we have to admit that.

First the good news. We have more money than the GOP and in the Senate's high marquee races they have picked much worse candidates than they did in 94. In 94, the GOP picked candidates that were tailor made for their states and opponents. In Massachusetts they picked the then liberal, pro gay, Mitt Romney who provided a squeaky clean, youthful image to run against Kennedy. Turned out it didn't work, but on paper it should have and but for Kennedy's second wife, it might well have. In California, they picked a self financed moderate Huffington to run against Feinstein. She won only because he had managed to break the one and only law he wrote while in the House. This time the GOP has candidates that are total whack jobs running in Nevada, Alaska, and Colorado two of which should have been certain or near certain pick ups for them. Instead, they are at best, 50/50 shots. Our money advantage should allow us to spend in all the races we need to spend in.

Now for the not so good. We are, and have been, behind in the generic polls for Congress for months. We have long time Senate incumbents in trouble in the Senate. Boxer, Feingold, and Reid are all trending behind their opponents. They are all good campaigners who are survivors, but behind is behind. All three could easily lose along with PA where we are all but certain to lose, plus both Arkansas and North Dakota where we are dead in the water and that gives 6 seats to the GOP. We are showing no signs of having any certain pick ups to offset those loses. We might win in OH, KY, or NC but that is pretty much it. All three, we are behind.

Right now I still prefer our Senate hand to theirs but the House is iffy. We have a lot of Republican drawn seats we are defending that we could well lose. Add in some long term incumbents that are in some degree of trouble and it looks a lot closer than I like. I think we need to acknowledge this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
The trolls are working overtime tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, we are in trouble. But rather than obsessing about it, are we going to get busy?
What do you plan to do to help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have no incumbents around me in trouble
the closest would be Larry Kissel who is by Charlotte, which is a several hour drive. If the national party deigns to help Marshall so she becomes competative I will be helping her which should, by extension, help our endangered seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good job. Van Hollen is my congressman who is pretty safe. So, I'm traveling to PA on the weekends
to help Sestak. Some phone banking as well when I can't travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. Not "around you" perhaps...
...but certainly in range of your checkbook.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. I join you in acknowledging it
Frankly, there's really not a thing that's going to happen to change the trajectory of this for the next couple of months, so I think we need to look one election beyond this one.

After the 2008 election, when everybody was writing the Rethuglicans off as dead, the tea partiers saw it as their chance to take over that party. They pushed aside anyone labeled as a RINO, and got their own candidates on the ballot. I say we look at this year as an opportunity to get rid of the Blue Dogs and DINO's, and find some untainted progressives to run in 2012.

President Obama will be at the top of the ticket, and he will have the power to bring our base to the polls. Even if he's still doing poorly in approval ratings, we can try to get behind solid progressives that voters will elect as a counterbalance to a tea party president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. You make some good points. (aside) I think a Boxer win is a clear bet in CA.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I would rank her as our best bet of the ones in trouble
She is in a friendly state, has run in tough campaigns in the past, and has a resevoir of good will. On the bad side she has the best opponent of the three but I still would bet on her before either Reid or Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah. Boxer's got a well established state wide network of supporters and donors and a good
track record. Plus, she campaigns well. (I'm in CA.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Good
I've been wanting to hear from someone who actually lives there for an assessment. I couldn't bear Fiorina on the Senate floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Boxer better win, if she loses then it is all over
But I am sure she will retain her senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Unless the Democrats come out and say the repukes will destroy Social Security and Medicare, and
that the republicans have been wanting to destroy unions since reagan, and were against rescuing the American car companies, and have been pushing to eliminate all regulation which is what led us to the financial crisis we are in we will not stand a chance.

It is way past due that the Democrats start to attack, if they don't then we will lose badly




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Not sure the social security angle works any more
It has worked nicely before, but not sure it will work
enough to pull us out this year. Lack of jobs is the biggest
reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. It isn't an angle, it is true, among several goals the republican party has had since reagan, it is
to destroy social security and medicare


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. But we DON'T have more money than the GOP when all of the outside groups are counted. I've heard
this reported on MSNBC AND CNN that the numbers are misleading. Rove, Barbour, and others have raised a lot of money that hasn't been counted when adding up the $ the DNC vs. the RNC raised, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Most DUers understand we're in trouble...
We just realize obsessing about the negative aspect of the situation ain't gonna do a damn thing.

Things are not set in stone. A week in an election cycle can be a lifetime. Months can be two lifetimes to a campaign.

This time in 2008, many pundits were talking about the resurgent McCain campaign. We were hunkering down for a tight race that, at the moment, had momentum shifting away from the Democrats.

By mid-September, Pres. Obama regained the lead and never really lost it again.

I'm not suggesting that will happen here. I believe Democrats will lose seats. I believe it'll be very close as to whether they control both the House & Senate. But I also understand that what seems dire today might not be as dire a month from now.

The election season is now officially really getting under way. Obama is going to be out on the trail for many Democrats and regardless of the perception here on DU, he's still plenty popular in a great deal of states.

Let's see what happens the next month before we officially hit the panic button and concede massive losses in November.

Democrats are in trouble. But there is a whole lot of ballgame to be played and remember, they're still leading officially (even if that lead is superficial and built on seats that are gonna shift Republican this November).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. +1000. Seriously it is like every second has to be doom and gloom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oswaldactedalone Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Open up your wallet and support our candidates.
Volunteer to GOTV. Register voters. We must beat back the Republicon menace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. We know we're in trouble... that's why we're responding to the doom-and-gloomers and
those whose rhetoric helps the GOP.



DU is rife with folks who have an agenda to help the GOP... some call themselves "the left", and some don't.


But their end goal is the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. How are your local GOTV efforts coming along? Does it look like your local Congresscritter will win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. my local congressman is a slam dunk
If he were to lose we would have to lose something like 100 seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocraticPilgrim Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
17. I think positivity will keep us motivated to the finish line,we can do damage assessment aftert that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. I don't think we will have more money than the Repubs when all is said and done.
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 01:51 AM by BzaDem
They have independent expenditure organizations that are collecting over 200 million dollars.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/08/democrats-fear-they-cant_n_639202.html

Furthermore, the generic ballot alone currently indicates a 50-90 seat gain by the Republicans. It is just that bad. We need to be ahead by 5-7 among registered voters for a tie in the House, and right now we are behind by 10. I don't think it will stay this bad until election day, but if the election were held today we would easily lose the House.

The Senate will come down to Boxer in CA, Feingold in WI, and Murray in WA. The latter 2 are trailing in most polls and the former is ahead in about half the polls. I think we probably have a greater than 50 percent chance of holding the Senate, but not much more than that.

The Senate is the really important thing because of appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. You are a realist and not a dreamer like many here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. So, let's just give up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm quite sure you're enjoying every minute of it. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
26. I agree with most of what you say, but I am more cautiously optimistic
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 08:24 AM by karynnj
First, on the negative side, I think you could add that compared to 1994, the broadcast media is far to the right of where it was in 1994. This means that Democrats need clear simple messages that President Obama and others can use to frame the choice in our favor. They can not completely ignore the President.

From the bits and pieces that we are beginning to here, Obama's Ohio speech on putting billions into improving the infrastructure could end up being the spark of excitement needed. We need to get America working again - this rather than permanently eliminating the estate tax on estates over $7 million and keeping taxes for those making over %250,000 below Clinton levels makes a real nice frame of the different choices. (Those tax changes affect very, very few people)

This would seem to be something that would fundamentally be welcome to almost every part of the democratic base. It is a progressive idea. It is something the unions will be enthusiastic about. It also should make "good government" people anywhere on the spectrum happy because it is addressing a real problem in a non-gimmicky serious way. I would suspect that some people disillusioned and scared for the future would see this as a serious attempt to make the future better - and not partisan politics and yelling.

I suspect that this could increase the energy level on the left - which itself would tip many close races to us. Reid's race has actually trended in his favor. Murray, Boxer, and Feingold could be helped by this and I think in all cases, their opponents have lavishly outspent them on ads. It could be that - especially in Boxer's case, Fiorina's ads have reached the point of saturation, where everyone who wants to hear her has - and Boxer has had far fewer ads.

I do agree with you that to say that everything is great would be delusional. But, I think the take away is that we need to regain our enthusiasm (of 2008) or at least our motivation of 2006 to stop the Republicans. As to the latter the fact that the Republicans have so many extreme tea party candidates should make this possible. If that happens, all the "likely voter" models will be blown away. They assume that the Republicans will be out in force and our base completely not motivated. With that as the assumption, we have nowhere to go put up on this. (I was reading one Illinois poll, where the self reported votes of those polled as "likely voters" in 2008 would have resulted in Obama winning by 6 - instead of 25 points. Imagine that we get half of those people out and voting for the Democrats.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC