Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Game On"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 09:02 AM
Original message
"Game On"
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 09:09 AM by Pirate Smile
Game On

07 Sep 2010 09:35 am



Yesterday's speech by the president, if you missed it, was a barn-stormer. Yes, it's the same old, same old pattern: he allows the opposition not just to vent and criticize (as they should) but to control the discourse for months, to drown out every other sound, to vent and crow and vilify and intimidate the cable news weenies into quivering puppies in need of crate-training. And then he comes back with a speech like that one.

I can't for the life of me see how the Democrats retain the House under these economic conditions, but that cannot and does not mean that what Obama has done in his first year and a half is a failure. On the contrary. On almost all the substantive stuff, he has in my view done the right and responsible and sane thing within the almost impossible constraints he was presented with. And given the legacy he inherited, what he has done is simply not enough to perform an economic or political or cultural miracle. That's the brutal truth and we have to face it. And if Americans thought they were voting for a savior, rather than a pragmatic president, they were deluding themselves.

When the economy imploded in the fall of 2008, there was simply precious little room for fiscal maneuver after the largely Republican-led spending and borrowing spree of the previous decade. The stimulus prevented the world falling into an economic abyss - just - but it was never going to get us out of the ditch we're in.
Don Peck's brilliant cover-story is worth re-reading again on that score. And it was good to hear the president state this yesterday:

Eight million Americans lost their jobs in this recession. And even though we’ve had eight straight months of private sector job growth, the new jobs haven’t been coming fast enough. Now, here’s the honest truth, the plain truth. There’s no silver bullet. There’s no quick fix to these problems. I knew when I was running for office, and I certainly knew by the time I was sworn in, I knew it would take time to reverse the damage of a decade worth of policies that saw too few people being able to climb into the middle class, too many people falling behind. We all knew this. We all knew that it would take more time than any of us want to dig ourselves out of this hole created by this economic crisis.


The other brutal truth is that the opposition has nothing substantive to offer to remedy this. If all they've got is keeping the Bush tax cuts for those earning over $250,000 a year, they really have got nothing. What they do have is cultural symbolism and the exhausted right-left tropes that were trotted out at the mercifully vacuous parade of God and Country on the Mall with Beck and Palin. (A cynical atheist's parody of such vacuousness can be read here.) Maybe in power, by some miracle, the Tea Party Republicans will actually propose the long-term massive cuts in entitlements they claim to believe in. But I don't believe it for a second. I don't believe they are in any way serious about spending restraint and are only serious about their bewilderment at the real America where racial, religious and cultural diversity is a fact, where illegal immigration has been plummeting, where gay marriage is winning, where legal abortion will never go away, and where the new empire the last administration embarked upon has bankrupted us for a generation at least.

And this, in the end, must be what our politics is about: substantive policy responses to profound crises inherited from the past. Obama's call for transportation infrastructure investment is one tiny but real response and no panacea but it's paid for and it's something. His persistent attempt to get a real two-state solution in Israel-Palestine is unlikely to succeed given the forces arrayed against it in Washington and Tehran but it is necessary if we are to win this long war against Jhadism. His endurance in Afghanistan is, in my view, a tragic mistake, but anyone who claims that withdrawal would not have appalling moral consequences and great strategic risks is lying to you. His diplomatic and economic isolation of Iran's coup regime may also fail to prevent the Revolutionary Guards getting a nuclear capacity, but the alternative - a military strike - would initiate a new round of global religious warfare of terrifying gravity, where the Islamists would have the moral high-ground of being attacked first. His success in bringing a modicum of healthcare security to the working poor is also a work in progress but again, the practical alternative on the table is ... what exactly?

In the end, these difficult practical decisions will count because they have to count. And Obama's persistent refusal to take the red-blue bait still pushed by Fox News like a cheap bump of ideological meth is to his credit. It is emphatically not about his failure to "take them on". He is taking them on - but on his terms, not theirs'. Take it away, Mr president:

When it comes to just about everything we’ve done to strengthen our middle class, to rebuild our economy, almost every Republican in Congress says no. Even on things we usually agree on, they say no. If I said the sky was blue, they say no. If I said fish live in the sea, they’d say no. They just think it’s better to score political points before an election than to solve problems. So they said no to help for small businesses, even when the small businesses said we desperately need this. This used to be their key constituency, they said. They said no. No to middle-class tax cuts. They say they’re for tax cuts; I say, okay, let’s give tax cuts to the middle class. No. No to clean energy jobs. No to making college more affordable. No to reforming Wall Street. They’re saying right now, no to cutting more taxes for small business owners and helping them get financing.

You know, I heard -- somebody out here was yelling “Yes we can.” Remember that was our slogan? Their slogan is “No we can’t.”


In all this, the president deserves constructive criticism, but also moral and political support in engaging actual problems with actual solutions. Those on the left and in the middle who once saw his potential have no reason to abandon him now. If you were one of them, he needs you and this country needs you now more than ever before.

The full speech after the jump: .....

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/09/the-fourth-quarter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I saw it and LOVED IT!
Funny how everyone on Morning Schmoe this morning was ignoring the impact of his speech or his plans to turn the economy around. They just kept slamming him "talking about him like a dog" like any other day. Just proves President Obama's point..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. They can't afford to talk about Obama turning the economy around because
in 2010, "it's the jobs, stupid". If the President can drum up some hope that the jobs situation is about to improve, then the Democrats should do better at the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. So true! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. This was a great read. Fired up and ready to go. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_ed_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Amazing
A few months ago, all we heard was "we need 60 votes to get anything done." Funny how things sound a lot different now that it's election season. I wonder if we'll hear stuff like this in December?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. How was the original message wrong?
It *did* take 60 votes to get anything done, it wasn't an easy 60 votes to get on anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_ed_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Bush didn't
need 60 votes to accomplish all of his goals. Is the government fundamentally different in form than it was during his terms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Democrats are responsible will actually govern; Republicans are not.
Democrats also have more red state elected officials than Republicans do blue state ones. So comparisons are nowhere near apples to apples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. what the hell are you talking about?
Everything he has accomplished took 60 votes.

Were you note here for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Bush didn't accomplish all his goals.
He wanted to make the tax cuts permanent, but didn't have the votes to do so.

He wanted to privatize social security, but didn't have the votes to do so.

He wanted to amend the constitution so it said marriage was solely between a man and a woman. He didn't have the votes.

Bush got a lot. Obama's got a lot. But don't fool yourself. He came up short a great deal of the time because he didn't have sixty votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. We are now beginning to see
the end game. The point of all of this has been to prove "if I said fish live in the sea, they would say no".

The point is and has always been to give them a choice, form a governing coalition, or refuse to govern. They have steadfastly chosen the latter, now the check is due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. love this post. thankyou thankyou thankyou
this is what Obama is about.

he gave them a chance. he knows when its time to campaign and he's going to slaughter the fuckers. slaughter them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC