Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Left Largely Helpless As Judicial Vacancies Reach Crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:07 PM
Original message
Obama Left Largely Helpless As Judicial Vacancies Reach Crisis
The Obama administration is aware of the growing alarm over its inability to fill long-standing judicial vacancies. White House officials frequently voice displeasure with the pace, offer heated indictments of the GOP's stalling tactics, and occasionally threaten to circumvent the Congressional process. But for all the rhetoric, threats and critiques, even sympathetic observers acknowledge that the president is largely powerless (if not helpless) on the matter.

That's because both he and allies in Congress simply lack the tools to force the Republican Party's hand.

This past Friday, the Associated Press published a rather shocking report about just how poor Obama's record on judicial vacancies is. "Fewer than half of Obama's nominees have been confirmed," the news wire wrote, "102 out of 854 judgeships are vacant," and "forty-seven of those vacancies have been labeled emergencies by the judiciary because of heavy caseloads."

When pressed about the article's findings during Tuesday's daily briefing, however, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs offered only a well-trodden denunciation of the GOP's tactics.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/07/obama-left-largely-helple_n_707859.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Love the "liberal media" headline. "Obama weeping and quivering in the fetal position"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I will be standing up to Republican obstructionism this November
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1000
And so will anyone else who doesn't want another regime like the Bush years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two Words......
recess appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Change the f*&*%* fillibuster!!!
That will take care of everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly...
What he should do is find some of the most controvercial leftist judges, I mean ones that would make Eugene V. Debs look like a member of the John Birch Society, and give them recess appointments, with the promise of more to come unless the repulbicans start acting like fucking adults. That's how you play hardball, Messrs Obama and Emmanuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Okay, we have the silly suggestion out of the way, now what do you really think he
ought to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. What exactly is the answer besides recess appointments?
And why not use the power that he has to walk around an obstructionist Republican Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Recess appointments for judges.
So how many lawyers are you gonna get to give up their law practices for a part of a year appointment to a federal judgeship?

Or perhaps you're gonna convince judges who sit on a state court to walk away from their appointed/elected positions and take a part of a year appointment? Knowing that they won't be able to go back to those state level jobs, and that there's a good likelihood that they won't be confirmed as a federal judge, how many of those are you going to attract?

Or law school professors, they're going to give up their tenured positions and take a federal judgeship for a few months, then have to go back out into today's job market?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I like that a lot.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. yeah. Why not?
What is wrong with us as a political organization? They have roadblocked almost all appointments, so fight the fuck back and recess every damn one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. yeah, it's Obama's fault that the GOP is blocking everything...
if only he were willing to compromise with the Coburns and Kyls...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. They always seem to ignore the Republican actions don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe if only the president would reach across the aisle in the spirit of bi-partisanship, pubs
would meet him in the middle in a show of good faith and statesmanship, thereby performing their constitutionally-mandated duties. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. ...would cut off his hand, then his arm, then .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Duuuuuuuuuude
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC