Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Micheal Moore.. I am sorry but you are totally out to lunch on this one

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:04 PM
Original message
Micheal Moore.. I am sorry but you are totally out to lunch on this one

Ground Zero is a remembrance for those who died.. no religious organization, Muslim, Christian, Hindu, etc. should be building on the site. I know you are trying to make a point..but making a point on the head of a pin..why give those who have derided you before.. ammunition to derail all you have done. Just because you can say it..does not mean you need to say it.. Just because you can do it.. does not mean that you should do it.
Nobody's point of view is that golden, not mine, not yours, not anyone's.


Trending: Build Islamic center on Ground Zero, says Moore

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/



(CNN) – Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore is weighing in on the proposed Islamic Community Center in New York City, stirring the the pot by saying he doesn't want it to be built near Ground Zero but rather on Ground Zero.

"I want it built on Ground Zero. Why? Because I believe in an America that protects those who are the victims of hate and prejudice," Moore writes in an open letter on his website. "I believe in an America that says you have the right to worship whatever God you have, wherever you want to worship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree.
To me he was pot stirring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There is no point, other than trying to stir the bat sh*t crazy agains Muslims
and there is enough of that going on without something like this. I can guarantee you this.. no Muslim is jumping up and down for joy at this. People are on the point of violence.. that is that road that goes both ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. I'm with you on this.
The Imam has every Constitutional right to build a community center wherever he wants, so long as he complies with local ordinances, like zoning, construction codes, safety codes, etc., fairly applied.

The folks have every Consitutional right to burn the Koran, subject to similar local ordinances, fairly applied.

The First Amendment, however, does not contain the word "wisdom."

I am on record here as believing that the cultural center would cause many, many problems here in the U.S. because of its location. I believed then and I do now, that the problems will complete outweigh any progress toward understanding and reconciliation between Muslims and the rest of the U.S. populace.

As I understand it, the Imam was on Larry King recently and stated that he could not move the mosque now because there would be a huge and ugly problem with conservative muslims who would not accept any concessions to the Crusaders. Please correct me if I am wrong on this.

That statement made it infinitely worse.

Now, there's a conservative pastor of a small, non-denominational Protestant church, who wants to exercise his Constitutional right to free speech.

Lots of folks in DC get really upset because they think that our troops may suffer more attacks as a result of the pastor exercising his Constitutional right to free speech, and they may be right.

Now, the Florida pastor has backed down.

There is no indication that any high administration official talked directly and privately to the Imam in New York counseling him on what kind of problems he might be unnecessarily be causing to himself and ty the U.S. by exercising his Constitutional.

The Florida pastor has made the wise move by compromising. The Imam, who did not get good advice, IMHO, is not comprising, and it appears due to fear.

I don't see a lot of winners here.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:44 PM
Original message
I think everyone is missing one gigantic point
This is about property rights. Park51 was donated to an Islamic organization. Once they accept the donation it belongs to the organization to use in any way they see fit. If people feel that it would be best if it is not used by said Islamic association than they must offer to buy land and building at a fair market price or offer an equal to or greater value property to the association. I have not heard of anyone making such an offer. Without that offer no on can say that the Imam is not willing to compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. Another GIGANTIC point most on this thread are missing
To even make claims of "sensitivity" or "wisdom" one must begin from the fundamental stance of COLLECTIVE BLAME. That is part and parcel of bias, bigotry and prejudice. A little consciousness raising is in order IMHO. What I observe from all the hoopla is a people being led around by the nose by a craven media and a complete subjugation of the cognitive to the emotionally arousing. Those supporting Park51 have no legitimate reason to "compromise" and I certainly hope they won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. No one is stopping anyone from putting that piece of property on the market.
Edited on Sat Sep-11-10 06:19 PM by amandabeech
If it is a charitable donation, it will be only a paper loss for the group.

You misconstrue "property rights". Property rights here in the U.S. do not obligate private citizens to purchase property from owners whose land use choice they find disagreeable.

If the government takes the property in a condemnation action to use for a purpose thought to be of great benefit to the community, then the government must give fair compensation. This applies only to the government, not to private citizens.

Moreover, it is not the responsibility of individuals to compensate the Imam and his financial backers for any unwise purchase of property.

If the Imam had asked me, or lot of people whom he apparently does not talk to, I would have said in the strongest possible terms, "DON'T DO IT!!!"

He and his group have survived the local land use proceedings, and he and his backers have the legal right to build there, but he and his backers will undoubtedly have ongoing problems with this site.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. anti muslim bigotry is whack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Yup nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. And I believe in Michael Moore's America
Sorry you missed his point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I did not miss his point at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm sure you don't believe you did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I am not going to go around in circles about this.. I said in the OP I understood his point
And I totally disagree with how he is trying to make it. You can remove a skin cancer on you arm by surgical means or you can blow your arm off with a gun.. both gets the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. A religious building at Ground Zero is the same as blowing your arm off?
Okay. I'll let you have that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. self delete.. posted in wrong place..
Edited on Sat Sep-11-10 02:18 PM by Peacetrain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. There should be no religious places of worship on Ground Zero
And that should go for everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I 100% agree..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Right Ground zero should always and only be a monument to PNAC treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Careful what you wish for
I'm assuming you are being sarcastic here.

Next thing you know there will be a Southern Baptist fundamentalist megachurch there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. As long as it has a copy of the paper saying how ONLY A PEARL HARBOR LIKE EVENT CAN ALLOW PUBLIC
support for their permanent war plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm so glad someone said this out loud. He's way off on this one...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I am so opposed to any religious community putting up a site on ground zero itself..
I had to say something..So many people of so many faiths and agnostics died there.. it should be just a place of reflection..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Exactly..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Considering Ground Zero is a cemetery
It seems to me that religious communities would have no better site than ground zero, considering the entire site is a giant cemetery. Most religions seem to have a tremendous focus on what happens after death, so ground zero being a cemetery would attract them like moths to a flame.

I am a complete agnostic, and have no problems with any and all religious communities getting to set up any type of worship/community facilities they like. As long as all are granted equal access. It is all nonsense to me. However, being an airline pilot who was actually working on 9/11, I understand peoples' need to make sense and take meaning from the event through religion.

I think a good compromise might be setting aside floor space in the new site for every sect who wants one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. A reflective place where each person can be how they need to be..
Edited on Sat Sep-11-10 02:35 PM by Peacetrain
Edit to add.. there is not enough space to give each religious sect its own place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Think 3D
By 3D, I mean think vertical. The proposed "Freedom Tower" is going to be one of the largest "spaces" on the planet. Certainly one or two floors would be sufficient.

The alternative would be to deny all religious groups any space. Personally, I would prefer that, but the USA is almost medieval in its insistence on religions place in society. So, for the masses, the building probably needs religious space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. I love MM - MOST of the time. There are several things I have
disagreed with him on. And this is another one.

I'm not going to "throw him under the bus" but I agree with you - he is totally out to lunch on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Agree. But I was also against building a new commercial building
there as a memorial to capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. This makes no sense
"And I believe in an America that says to the world that we are a loving and generous people and if a bunch of murderers steal your religion from you and use it as their excuse to kill 3,000 souls, then I want to help you get your religion back. And I want to put it at the spot where it was stolen from you," he added.


He wants Muslims to get their religion back by building on the spot where 3,000 souls lost their lives?

Then again, Moore also wrote this:

All I can say is, they had better build that mosque now. If a Florida bigot can get a place of worship halted because of his threats, then we are all truly doomed. All this crap about how if the Koran was burned "we'd really be hated by Muslims then!" Are you kidding me? Get outta the house and take a trip through the Arab world! THEY ALREADY HATE OUR GUTS. And not because of a stupid book burning. They hate us because we've killed hundreds of thousands of their people! We've claimed their oil as ours. Never ever forget that Saddam Hussein was armed and supported for years by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. And WE overthrew the democratically-elected government in Iran. We continue to prop up the dictators of the Arabian peninsula and we have turned our backs on the Palestinian people.

They don't hate us for a book burning. White people of European ancestry have enjoyed a good book burning for some time now!


A complete lack of perspective.

Thousands protest Koran burning plan in Afghan north





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Talking down to Muslims like they were children is not helpful at all
Muslims did not lose their religion because a bastardized sect (like the Klu Klux Klan is a bastardized sect of Christianity..using its symbols to terrorize and or power gain) attacked the Twin Towers.

MM just has gotten way ahead of himself on this. What he is saying is not making any sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. It's as if he's
lost all his perspective on everything..I don't like what he's doing to dumb down America. He has a big mic and he's using it foolishly like a demagogue who's not interested in facts but only in the next feeding frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
20.  At Pentagon, Muslims pray without protests
Edited on Sat Sep-11-10 02:47 PM by BrklynLiberal
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iqvSi9taAHCsJwHTtrYovIB4al5g

WASHINGTON — Without controversy or protests, Muslims kneel in prayer every day at a quiet Pentagon chapel, only steps away from where a hijacked airliner struck the building on September 11, 2001.

The tranquil atmosphere at the Pentagon is a stark contrast to the furor surrounding a planned mosque near Ground Zero in New York, with opponents arguing the proposed Islamic center is an insult to the memory of the 3,000 victims of the 9/11 attacks.

"I've been here almost four years and I've never heard of any complaints," US Army spokesman George Wright said of the regular Muslim services.

Families of those killed in the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11 have not raised objections over the Islamic services, he said.

On Friday afternoon, an imam led about 18 Muslim men and women in prayer. They knelt beneath a stained-glass window bearing an image of the Pentagon, an American bald eagle and the words: "United in memory, September 11, 2001."
<snip>
About 60 feet (18 meters) away from the chapel, American Airlines Flight 77 slammed into the west side of the Pentagon on 9/11, killing 184 people. The chapel, and a memorial room for the victims of the attack, were added when the damaged wing of the building was rebuilt.

The chapel is open to all faiths, and shortly before the Friday prayers, there was a Jewish service on the schedule.

"There are Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Mormon, Episcopal, Hindu and Muslim services," Wright said.

The Pentagon chaplain's office has recently received inquiries about possible Buddhist services at the chapel as well, he told AFP.
<snip>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. It is totally and completely non-denominational and it is not sponsored
by any religion.

It is run by the chaplains office, which takes all religious men and women into its branch of the service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Rec'd...
He is off base and seems hungry for attention right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. +1 That was my first thought.
This seems attention-seeking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. its what agitators do
he knows there is no chance of that happening so he is just saying that so us on the left can say "yeah! right on Mike!!!

Noting but shit stirring.

Its like the Gov of Texas talking about secession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. How big is Ground Zero ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. "Ground Zero is a remembrance for those who died" - wrong.
There is a memorial there, but it is also an enormous commercial development project. 1 WTC is a 2.5M square feet office building. Tower two - another 2.5M sq ft of commercial office space. Tower three - 2M sq ft of commercial office space. Tower four - 1.8M sq ft. - commercial office space ....


So, what exactly is your point about the appropriate use of this 'hallowed ground'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
34. I disagree with your take on Moores take
IF "Ground Zero is a remembrance for those who died" Then there should have been a memorial built there, like at Pearl Harbor. Instead, it's just a hindrance to a real estate development deal.

I can't ever tell when Moore is being satirical ala Swifts "Modest proposal" any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. it is a piece of fucking real estate...
that is all it is. They bought it, and the city approved it. This is not some "sacred ground' that needs to be worshipped due to fear. Yes fear- that is all 9/11 is used for, to keep the population afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. wow, really lack the satire bone....
Listen. You start by claiming that an office building project is some sort of place of holy rules. That in itself is funny. If you can claim as sacred that which you will abide being used as office space, I am not surprised that you don't get it. It is an joke.
My version has been that they should build a huge, domed and minaretted mosque in Battery Park, as a capper to Lower Manhattan, right across from Lady Liberty. Same joke, a few blocks down. What can you say?
These jokes mean 'Let them make the center as planned, you book burning hate mongers'. Do you still not agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I'm not sure it's what I'd call a joke...
...but it certainly sounds satirical. I think he's quite serious about the let-them-build meaning you divined, and I'll agree with him at least that far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
40. Religious Freaks are going to get us all killed.
I wish they would take the time to read their instruction books.

The only church that belongs at the WTC site would be a gilded Cathedral
to the Giant Invisible Hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
41. Unrec for misrepresenting his piece. Picking a small bit an ignoring the rest is wrong.
For instance :
There's been so much that's been said about this manufactured controversy, I really don't want to waste any time on this day of remembrance talking about it. But I hate bigotry and I hate liars, and so in case you missed any of the truth that's been lost in this, let me point out a few facts:

1. I love the Burlington Coat Factory. I've gotten some great winter coats there at a very reasonable price. Muslims have been holding their daily prayers there since 2009. No one ever complained about that. This is not going to be a "mosque," it's going to be a community center. It will have the same prayer room in it that's already there. But to even have to assure people that "it's not going to be mosque" is so offensive, I now wish they would just build a 111-story mosque there. That would be better than the lame and disgusting way the developer has left Ground Zero an empty hole until recently. The remains of over 1,100 people still haven't been found. That site is a sacred graveyard, and to be building another monument to commerce on it is a sacrilege. Why wasn't the entire site turned into a memorial peace park? People died there, and many of their remains are still strewn about, all these years later.

2. Guess who has helped the Muslims organize their plans for this community center? The JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER of Manhattan! Their rabbi has been advising them since the beginning. It's been a picture-perfect example of the kind of world we all want to live in. Peter Stuyvessant, New York's "founder," tried to expel the first Jews who arrived in Manhattan. Then the Dutch said, no, that's a bit much. So then Stuyvessant said ok, you can stay, but you cannot build a synagogue anywhere in Manhattan. Do your stupid Friday night thing at home. The first Jewish temple was not allowed to be built until 1730. Then there was a revolution, and the founding fathers said this country has to be secular -- no religious nuts or state religions. George Washington (inaugurated around the corner from Ground Zero) wanted to make a statement about this his very first year in office, and wrote this to American Jews: (clip))

Friends, we all have a responsibility NOW to make sure that Muslim community center gets built. Once again, 70% of the country (the same number that initially supported the Iraq War) is on the wrong side and want the "mosque" moved. Enormous pressure has been put on the Imam to stop his project. We have to turn this thing around. Are we going to let the bullies and thugs win another one? Aren't you fed up by now? When would be a good time to take our country back from the haters?

I say right now. Let's each of us make a statement by donating to the building of this community center! It's a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization and you can donate a dollar or ten dollars (or more) right now through a secure pay pal account by clicking here. I will personally match the first $10,000 raised (forward your PayPal receipt to webguy@michaelmoore.com ). If each one of you reading this blog/email donated just a couple of dollars, that would give the center over $6 million, more than what Donald Trump has offered to buy the Imam out. C'mon everyone, let's pitch in and help those who are being debased for simply wanting to do something good. We could all make a huge statement of love on this solemn day.

I lost a co-worker on 9/11. I write this today in his memory. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Unrec to your hearts content.. but if you cannot see why I said Micheal was
Edited on Sun Sep-12-10 11:47 AM by Peacetrain
off in the ether with how he is doing this..there is nothing I can do to change your mind.. But this is right off of Micheals Blog.. it is on the front page

"I believe in an America that says to the world that we are a loving
and generous people and if a bunch of murderers steal your religion from
you and use it as their excuse to kill 3,000 souls, then I want to help you get
your religion back


How offensive that is to Muslims.. I do not even know where to begin. Muslims did not lose their religion on 9/11 ..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I agree no churches in WTC site, but I agree with the rest, including, I want to help you
get your religion back, rather than having to be fearful and hiding it. A group of murderers struck on 9/11 and helped give many the excuse to take away the rights of Muslims. How offensive is it that mosques across the country, that anyone with a turban, that a community center have come under attack? How offensive is it that I have, at times, not worn salwar kameez that I got from my family because people might take me for a murderous Muslim? How offensive is it that my father, born and raised in ND, is taken aside for extra screening when he flies because he has dark skin and might be an OMG MUSLIM!! How offensive is it that President Obama is called a Muslin as an insult?

THAT is how I take Michael Moore's piece. THOSE are offensive, very offensive. The bigotry of people, the lies spread about "OMG MUSLIMS!" since 9/11 are offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. link for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. Have you all lost your ever-loving minds?
What's next, writing Jonathan Swift to give him apiece of your mind about his recommendation to eat babies?


"Dear Satirists,
Please, when we are being unreasonable, pamper us.

Sincerely,
The babies who, able to drink nothing but milk,
ask the rest of you to stop eating steak."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. nah, it's still too radioactive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-10 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
49. I didn't realize Moore was such a pothead that he bones up in the CNN bathroom
He obviously got hold of some heavy-duty Humboldt and fired up a doobie in the CNN bathroom before going on the teevee.

:crazy:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC