Quinnipiac CT Senate: Blumenthal 51% McMahon 45%
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:39 AM
Original message |
Quinnipiac CT Senate: Blumenthal 51% McMahon 45% |
|
This is somewhat closer than most other polls--why would McMahon be gaining?:
Quinnipiac 9/8-12/10; 875 likely voters, 3.3% margin of error Mode: Live telephone interviews (Quinnipiac release)
Connecticut
2010 Senate 51% Blumenthal (D), 45% McMahon (R) (chart)
Favorable / Unfavorable Richard Blumenthal: 55 / 39 Linda McMahon: 45 / 41
www.pollster.com
|
DrToast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
1. How do you know she is gaining? |
|
What were Quinnipiac's numbers before?
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I'm basing it on other polls which have given Blumenthal a double digit lead |
|
Maybe this is good for a Quinnipiac Poll, I don't know.
|
FBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. I'd say it's more a case of Blumenthal declining rather than McMahon gaining. |
|
Not that there's much of a way to tell the difference.
Quinnipiac actually shows the decline the best. In January they showed a 41% lead. Then it was down to 33%... then 25%... then 20%... and 17%... and 10%... and now 6%.
Rasmussen actually showed the gap increasing from 7% to 9% (and Blumenthal climbing back above 50%) and I assumed that it indicated that the bleeding had stopped.
I'm still reasonably confident that Blumenthal pulls this one out. It's just getting closer than I'd like. I'd hate to see DE move back to our side only to have CT drop into the competitive zone. Luckily, I don't think there's enough time for the decay in his numbers to hit the danger zone before the election. He just needs to avoid a major gafe.
|
TlalocW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Let's just hope it's just this one poll |
|
Last thing we need is the WWE in government.
TlalocW
|
Mrsadkins9399
(49 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I'm not from CT but I shudder at the thought of Vince McMahon anywhere near the Government.
|
Robbins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They had Lamont winning the primary as Governor so Blementhal's lead could be higher.Bottom line he will keep Dodd's seat despite what the MSM tried to do with him.It Is only a question of how much he will win by.
|
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Money plain and simple |
|
McMahon has been on the air for at least the last 4 months because she's financing her own campaign and has promised to spend up to 50 million dollars to buy the Senate seat.
This is tighter than the last poll, IIRC Quinnipiac had Blumenthal up by 10 last month but since then McMahon has had and won the puke primary and Blumenthal has been quiet. Rassmusen has Blumenthal up by 9 as of last week.
I'm encouraged by the Favorable/Unfavorable numbers, even with McMahon planting stories about Blumenthal he's clobbering her on the favorability charts.
I don't know how this will wash out but my opinion is that if Blumenthal can stay positive in his campaign he should win it by a fairly comfortable margin.
|
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Previous Quinnipiac was 50-40, so it is closer, but Blumenthal is above 50 % |
|
and there are only 3 % undecided.
|
DrToast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Not to mention her favorables seem maxed.* |
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Also the previous poll |
|
was registered voters and this is "likely voters". Given how pumped all the pollsters seem to think the pukes are they generally get pretty highly represented in that filter.
|
FBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
17. Good catch. I hadn't noticed that. |
|
Likely accounts for the entire shift.
|
Dawson Leery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I find this hard to believe. |
|
Only 39% see her as fit to be a Senator where 60%+ see Blumenthal as being fit to be a Senator. If this is the case, then Blumenthal should be polling higher.
|
Dawson Leery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Flawed poll! 37% of poll respondents were Republicans. |
|
CT voter registration by party: Republicans: 21% Democrats: 37% Ind: 41% Other: 1%
Democrats are energized to vote in this state because we have a chance at taking back the Governors Mansion. The last time a Democrat won the Governors Mansion was by William O'Neill in 1986.
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Wow, that's pretty blatant. |
|
Oversampling Republicans by 16% will skew the poll 5-6% in the other direction. I think Blumenthal wins comfortably.
|
Dawson Leery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. A 12% win for him would be the worst case |
|
scenario in an honest poll.
|
Marsala
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Likely voter filter is probably overestimating Republican turnout |
|
At any rate, this poll is the best case scenario for McMahon. She can't do any better.
|
Dawson Leery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-14-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.