Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA Governorship--Brown apologizes to Bill Clinton for Monica Lewinsky joke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 10:53 AM
Original message
CA Governorship--Brown apologizes to Bill Clinton for Monica Lewinsky joke
Jerry Brown apologized to Bill Clinton Monday for making a Monica Lewinsky joke during a campaign stop this weekend.

"Bill Clinton was an excellent president. It was wrong for me to joke about an incident from many years ago, and I'm sorry," California's Democratic nominee for governor said at a press conference Monday.


Brown was compelled to make the statement after The Page posted a video of Brown bashing Meg Whitman for using a 1992 clip of Clinton criticizing Brown's record on taxes.

The ad shows Clinton, who was fending off Brown in the Democratic presidential primary, saying that Brown raised taxes during his earlier term as governor, a claim Brown denied at the time and still disputes.

On Sunday, Brown said, "I mean, Clinton's a nice guy, but whoever said he always told the truth?"

Brown then mocked Clinton's infamous denial of an affair with Lewinsky. "I did not have taxes with this state," Brown said.

After making his apology, Brown tried to refocus his fire on Whitman, who he says is running a false ad pegged to Clinton's past remarks.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42131.html#ixzz0zWHbLEfi

(I'm having my doubts that Brown was the right candidate for the Dems to win back the CA governorship).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Never apologize (even when you know you are wrong)
It reveals weakness before your enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I have to admit I'm worried about CA--this really should have been an easy pick up for Dems given
the unpopularity of Arnold, but I'm just thinking that Brown is the past and we should have come up with somebody newer. Hopefully I'm wrong and Meg isn't making it easy with all of her cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The problem is which "new face" could have countered Meg and her money?
Newsome and Villaraigosa, who had years before been seen as future stars both accumulated way too much baggage for a really tough race. Name recognition is really needed to compensate for being incredibly outspent.

Caveat - I don't know California well - have never lived there and could well be not thinking of some Democratic superstar who did not run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I take this as a "John Lennon" apology
The reference here is to Lennon's Chicago press conference apology in 1966 at the beginning of a Beatles tour for a comment that came from a serious interview with Maureen Cleave of the London Evening Standard where he used the phrase that the "Beatles were bigger than Jesus". In context, it was not irreverent or inaccurate. It was reprinted in an American teen magazine, Datebook. It led to people = mostly in the South - burning Beatles' records. (From memory of a dedicated Beatles fan, so quite possibly not completely accurate - it was more than 40 years ago.)

His apology basically boiled down to apologizing for saying things that offended some. For me as a young teen, it was the first time I was conscious of this kind of non-apology apology. Here, Brown goes a bit further - saying the joke was "wrong", but it gives me the same vibes. As stated, he still say - and the budget numbers back him up - that Bill Clinton's accusation, which Whitman is using is just not true. That is the key point - and he said nothing to take back the claim that Clinton has played free and loose with the truth.

He is still discrediting Whitman's use of Clinton' charge. His apology and praise of Clinton as a President was done to try to assuage the hurt that Clinton fans (look at comment here) have - and as such was needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton and Brown don't like each other
When that ad came out, it was bound to bring up the old animosity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton not condemning Whitman's use of that clip in the context of this race isn't helping, either
This Whitman ad should have been countered immediately by Clinton before it increased the awkwardness of Brown's positions defending himself against Clinton's words from 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Good point - the budget numbers show that Clinton was "wrong"
As he is not running against Brown any more, it would have been decent for him to issued a statement that he had been inaccurate in that charge - possibly blaming it on an unnamed aide pulling the wrong years for the comparison.

The fact is that Whitman is using a KNOWN inaccuracy, using Bill Clinton saying it to give it credibility. As you said, Clinton could have immediately corrected Whitman. Given he didn't, it's not Brown's fault that Clinton's credibility was impeached here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. BClinton was wrong about Brown's tax record.
Every time Whitman pays to broadcast this ad, that misinformation is repeated over and over again. Since BClinton has confined his campaigning for the most part as payback for people that supported HClinton in the Dem party, I doubt he's interested in correcting the record on Brown's behalf. And that's a damn shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. It i actually shockingly dishonest
It i possible that he thought what he was saying in 1992 was true, but not publicly saying that he was wrong and demanding that Whitman take the ad off the air is wrong. If he did that, Brown could use Clinton's comment that the info is wrong and that Brown did a good job as Governor and that he had personally asked Whitman not to propagate a "mistake" on his part. This would likely force Whitman to take it down - or look dishonest.

The question is if Bill Clinton is a big enough man to put aside his own animosity. (If John Kerry could cordially meet with Pickens, whose transgressions against him were FAR greater, because it could possibly give a climate change bill a somewhat better chance of passing, certainly the man who headed the Democratic party for 8 years should be able to admit a mistake - or an aide's mistake, to help elect a Democratic Governor in the largest state in the country - for the time when Congressional districts will be defined.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. That's the core of all of this.
Brown's quip won't hurt him.

All it does is re-invigorate that news that Whitman is lying about Jerry and underscore her dishonesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't really see why Brown even had to apologize there
There is backup that Clinton was wrong in his charge. It is true that Clinton is not above lying in a campaign. He was called on in in 2008! The fact is that Clinton is known for abusing the truth when it suits his purposes. Another 1992 opponent, Bob Kerrey, was more explicit in his comment on Clinton's veracity - calling him an "unusually good liar". (Time had an interesting commentary that argued that he was actually not good at lying - but did not dispel the case that he did lie. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,988870-2,00.html)

I do think he might have been better off explaining that Clinton erred in making that charge - explaining that Clinton used the wrong years when he compared the budget, rather than using Clinton's reputation to dismiss it and make light of it. The fact is that given that it was Clinton, who both has lied when it helped him and who is very very sharp - I do think that the charge was likely an intentional lie in 1992 - and one that hurt. (The comments elsewhere that Clinton was STILL angry that Brown stayed in the race too long after it was clear that Clinton would win are rather ironic given 2008, where HRC stayed in far longer after it was clear she would not win - even after all the primaries were over.)

I do think that Brown is an excellent candidate for the governorship and think he will win. The fact that this makes you question if he is the right candidate ignores that the problem here was started by a Bill Clinton error (which he never conceded) or lie from 1992. Brown pointing out that Clinton was not known for telling the truth - in addition to putting out the numbers that dispute the 1992 lie that Whitman is using is fair - as is the joking reference to Clinton's most famous lie. Clinton is not running and, like it or not, his relationship with Lewinsky - and lying about it - are part of his legacy. (It is also true that Democrats have had Clinton's back far more often than he ever had theirs.)

The apology is simply good politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Brown should be apologizing for his opposition to prop 19 instead..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Great Bill Clinton Would Never Be In Danger Of Losing A Race To A Poltical Dilletante
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC