Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: WH Naming Warren Interim Director Of Consumer Bureau. UPDATE: False alarm.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:27 AM
Original message
Report: WH Naming Warren Interim Director Of Consumer Bureau. UPDATE: False alarm.
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 11:58 AM by jefferson_dem
:woohoo:

Obama Picks Warren

Reports coming in that President Obama will name Elizabeth Warren as interim director of the consumer protection bureau created by the new financial regulatory law.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/#

UPDATE: :(

False Alarm
Reports coming in that President Obama will name Elizabeth Warren as interim director of the consumer protection bureau created by the new financial regulatory law.

Late Update: Maybe not so fast. Fox was one of the outlets originally reporting this and has now retracted that report, saying they may have "misheard" White House spokesperson Bill Burton on board Air Force One. Reuters says Burton simply confirmed that Warren is "obviously in the mix."

Later Update: The pool report from Air Force One reads as follows:

on Warren:
no announcements but soon. no confirmation of interim appointment. essentially, nothing new

The Boy Who Cried Wolf Update: White House releases statement knocking down the reports:

Elizabeth Warren has been a stalwart voice for American consumers and families and she was the architect of the idea that became the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The President will have more to say about the agency and its mission soon.
Kicking Dead Horse Update: White House pool reporter sends supplement to pool report: "For emphasis: Burton did not say anything new about Warren."

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. YAY!!!! (But why "interim"?)
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Interim" may be a code-word for "recess appointment." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No, Not A Recess Appointment, It's A Year Long Interim Appointment
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 11:54 AM by Beetwasher
To get the agency up and running. He doesn't need Senate approval for this, but eventually they will have to have Senate confirmation for either Warren or a new pick. However, a year is all Warren would need to set the agency on a proper trajectory by establishing the rules, process and systems and staff it with career, non-political appointees who will carry on her imprint.

Apparently a false alarm though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think it's because she'll run in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah, After A Year There She Will Take Out Brown
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 11:56 AM by Beetwasher
I could live with that. She'll have made her very significant mark on the agency by then.

Though TPM is now saying this is a false alarm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Run for what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. because it's still indefinite but needs no senate involvement. smart move.
better than recess appointment by far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sweeeeeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!!!!! This Is So Very, Very Important!
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 11:31 AM by Beetwasher
:woohoo:

Warren's imprint on the agency will be incredibly important. She will be the one who builds it from the ground up and staff's it. She will write the rules and implement the systems and processes etc. She will in a large part decide it's long term trajectory and impact, even if she only stays there for a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. FINALLY! A real Progressive Move by the WH -- Woohoo!!
Hope they've learned that appeasing the right accomplishes nothing and we can hope for more love that benefits the left in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. And eff you, Pubs
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. I KNEW IT >> I KNEW IT>> I KNEW IT
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 12:04 PM by Peacetrain
:bounce: :bounce:

Edit to add... NUTSY FAGEN, just heard it was a false report.... well I still think she gets the nod.. so I am leaving my little bouncers up there

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's false report
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 11:55 AM by impik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Very smart move by the President and the Democrats...
It totally sidesteps the repubs ability to filibuster her nomination, she can get to work right away and has a year before her she must be nominated and go through the "normal" process.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. On MSNBC this morning, Chuck Todd said he heard from several sources that she WILL be appointed
through that way so she doesn't have to go through the confirmation process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I heard him say that it should be this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yup. I hope he's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. And Here's The Really Brilliant Part: She Stays Until Senate Confirms Her Or A New Pick
If Repubs fillibuster, she stays as long as they fillibuster. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. EXACTLY! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Dare I Say "11th Dimensional Chess"?
Edited on Tue Sep-14-10 01:24 PM by Beetwasher
Nahh, everyone knows Obama is some politically naive corporate hack. He's just doing this for the corporations. :sarcasm:(Well assuming of course he does do this and I have no doubt he will).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, you dare say it...
and I dare agree with it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattleblue Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. No just a year. That is all the law allows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I see no good reason for the delay in appointing Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. lol stand down little "Whoo Hoo!" man ..... stand down. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC