|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:02 PM Original message |
I think if the tax cut off would apply to people up to $500,,000 there would be more happy campers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DontTreadOnMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. $500K per year! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Slammed? Have they researched that? No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. the tax rate for people earning 250,000 per year of 33% is too high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. puhleezzz - we earn less and are in the 33% rate. If *I* am not complaining, why are YOU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
33. It's historically low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. oh for crying in a bucket. If you earn $500k you can afford to pay more in taxes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. with 2 people and a family? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yes, $500,000 will work for 2 people and a family. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. like me so the tax should be negligible for we low earners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. You are part of the under $250K that will get tax breaks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. They ARE tiered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Yes. Business tax and income tax are not the same thing. If a small businessman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Only 2 percent of small business owners make $250,000 or more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 11:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
26. Oh fuck that. Fuck that sideways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
38. Please don't fall for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
45. Yes. We make way less than that and could afford it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's not going to "slam" anyone! That's GOP BS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. it's not GOP bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. nope, GOP bullshit it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 07:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
30. You're making over $40,000 per MONTH and complaining about $800 in taxes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
41. No, she supposedly earns $40,000 a year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. But she's worried about the tax rate for those who earn $500,000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. Oh, but it is GOP bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 06:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
50. You do realize that the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. I think giving the rich tax breaks will eventually lead to a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. Do I hear $300,000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
34. How about a cool $1 mil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. They are not going to get slammed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
17. Those are wealthy people. Just because they are not Bill Gates level... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Naw...I am OK with $250,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. Those friends of yours will receive the exact same tax rates as those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
21. Some where in the area of $6500 is going to break them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #21 |
32. I know, this is such a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
besdayz (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
24. Screw them, the tax cuts were meant to be temporary, who cares about them!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-14-10 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
28. I think it's a really good idea, myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #28 |
35. If you're making $500K you're not just in the top 1%, but in the top one-tenth of a percent income! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovemydog (414 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
29. If I had my way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
31. You'd think the proposal was to go back to Eisenhower rates, for heaven's sake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:38 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. JFK reduced top rate to 70%! Is there no end to the greed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
37. no thanks, people making that much should pay more taxes. simple as that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
39. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
40. A majority of people supports letting the tax cuts for people above $250,000 expire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
44. Slammed, my ass. If they're making $500K, they can afford it. You're being scammed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-15-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
46. I'm sorry, $250,000 a year is RICH -- EVEN if you live in Manhattan or some other richie enclave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 06:53 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. There's always that crowd on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalun D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
47. 500K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 05:20 AM Response to Original message |
48. If you talked to people earning between $500k and $1,000,000 you would have had a similar result |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
49. In a room of 100 people you will only find about 3 people who this would effect ............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boomerbust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
52. Yes thats brutal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boomerbust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-10 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
53. Yes thats brutal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC