(R)asmussen Poll--PA Senate: Toomey 49% Sestak 41%
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:11 AM
Original message |
(R)asmussen Poll--PA Senate: Toomey 49% Sestak 41% |
|
Rasmussen 9/13/10; 750 likely voters, 4% margin of error Mode: Automated phone (Rasmussen release)
Pennsylvania
2010 Senate 49% Toomey (R), 41% Sestak (D) (chart)
Favorable / Unfavorable Pat Toomey: 57 / 33 Joe Sestak: 47 / 42
Job Approval / Disapproval Pres. Obama: 47 / 51 (chart) Gov. Rendell: 45 / 53 (chart)
www.pollster.com
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Not what I want to see. What has happened to Pennsylvania? These NE states used to be almost sure |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not always--in state elections it has been a swing state--remember Specter was a republican |
|
for years and then they elected Rick Santorum. It's actually socially conservative state in many ways.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Yes, but Specter was not a socially conservative republican by any means, especially |
|
by the standards of the republican party
However, I see your point, santorum was not only far right, he nuts
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
2. And my usual post-Rasmussen poll correction: Toomey 47%-Sestak 43% |
|
Always add +5 to the Democrat.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'll report their numbers and you can add the correction :) |
Sinistrous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-15-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Sestak's campaign has, so far, been bland and wimpy. |
|
When it has existed at all.
I hope he catches fire soon or we will be stuck with this horse diaper Toomey.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.