Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The UberRight's 2012 Dream Team

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 12:27 AM
Original message
The UberRight's 2012 Dream Team
Running Mate:



"Presidential" Candidate:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Even my strong Pub BILs don't like Sarah & I suspect feel
the same about Chris. They like them as people but never in charge of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have neighbors that would be first in the booth to vote for this ticket, sadly.
needless to say, we are not on good terms!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. I DON'T think so!
Two women, especially these two...nope. No way...

Well.......unless they want to lose, of course! :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. You do understand the reason for that picture.
Edited on Sat Sep-18-10 12:49 AM by RandomThoughts
It is to say 'big mouth'

And why there are manufactured events trying to change meaning of many things.

Trying to change what something is.


The pattern is to show something correct said by the person, then try to attach other things later, and if someone supports the good things she says, then to try and attach the bad things also to the person.




Her comment on not having to lie in a bad situation, that is true.

So then after you agree with that, they roll out the 'witch' comment to get that attachment.

I have seen that program before, it is easy to avoid those traps.


And she probably is a mostly good lady and all, just has a few issues, like everyone has issues. The problem is when they are platforms to change views, but have filters changing the meaning of them.


To be honest, she is being used for other reasons. And that is sad, I really like her. It is not her at any fault, it is someone else knowing she might miss a view or point, then using that to treat her badly by getting her to argue tangents to the original points.

She is a good person, that wants to do good with best intents.



The construction of her myth is plain to see, you can review the post history and see the pattern, and the intent. And it pisses me off when good people are used to be hurt just because they might have a flaw or two in how they see something. So I blame people like the thing behind the Mint guy and hold them responsible for pushing her forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think she's a bad person, but she has no business
playing in politics! The night she di her accespance speech I groaned that she sounded like a 13 year old with that little ha ha & the you betcha stuff. I comented that my granddaughter, who is 13, would NEVER speak like that in front of an audience. SHE is more mature than a woman who thinks she wants to be a US Senator!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Twin sisters of different mothers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocraticPilgrim Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. SoS Bachmann and Angle in charge of social security, yeah. Oh lord, don't worry ladies they don't...
Edited on Sat Sep-18-10 01:04 PM by DemocraticPilgrim
reflect on you. Just the GOP mind control tactics of repeat and rinse. Male, female even Republican pets which in most cases are wild should be voted against. Only lovable Democratic pets are the way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC