Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Comically misleading link-baiting headline of the day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:27 AM
Original message
Comically misleading link-baiting headline of the day
Found here:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/

From here:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/120939-kerry-blames-out-of-touch-voters-for-dems-image-troubles



Kerry blames out-of-touch voters for Democrats' midterm image troubles


That's based on this quote from John Kerry: "We have an electorate that doesn't always pay that much attention to what's going on so people are influenced by a simple slogan rather than the facts or the truth or what's happening." And Kerry goes on to say it's "appropriate" that public anger is directed at Washington.

Also: Alex Burns reports that the will today demand that Dem Senate candidates say whether they agree with Kerry. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly, not comical at all. You will find DUers stopping to read at the headline and blaming Kerry.
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:43 AM by Mass
And the Herald and the Hill have so much distorted what he said by their spin that their intent is clear. (surptisingly, the Herald's title is better than the Hill, though both articles are stupid).

From the article in the Herald, here is what he apparently said:

“We have an electorate that doesn’t always pay that much attention to what’s going on so people are influenced by a simple slogan rather than the facts or the truth or what’s happening,” Kerry told reporters after touring the Boston Medical Center yesterday.
...
“I think a lot of the anger today - while it’s appropriate because Washington is broken - is not directed at the right people,” said Kerry. “Barney is prepared, as others are, to explain what we’re doing. I think when people hear the facts and they see what we’re doing, it frankly makes sense.”

n the interview, Kerry added that voters should be mad at stonewalling Republicans and “big money” in politics instead, referring to a bill blocked by Republicans Thursday that would reveal corporate and union leaders who fund big-bucks political ads.

He went on to blame the legislative logjam in Washington, D.C., for fewer federal dollars sent to the state.


Of course, if you read what he answered, it makes total sense and is not blaming the voters, but talking about the need to inform.

Sadly, you can count on the media to disinform us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. A true statement that probably would have been best left unsaid
Much like Obama's Bittergate comments: true on substance, but there was no value to him actually saying something that would have been better said at an academic Sociology/political science conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He was being interviewed; should he have ignored the question?
fwiw, he is right. I'm glad someone is addressing this. And this is the actual Herald title...


John Kerry: Democrats’ woes stem from uninformed voters
http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view.bg?articleid=1284069


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He should repeat it
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 09:36 AM by ProSense
loud and often. Every Democrat should.

Fox ‘News’ Personalities Seen As Most Influential In Political Debate

This is nothing like Obama's comment. There is absolutely nothing controversial about Kerry's statement. Why the hell should controversy be attached to it because the RW distorts the actual statement? They're not even distorting the meaning. They're claiming Kerry said something he didn't say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Actually, Obama's bittergate was by far worse
The reason is that he spoke of people hanging onto their religion and guns and not voting their economic interest. But, as a Jew, i have long heard the comment = proudly repeated that we earn like Episcopalians, but vote like Porto Ricans. In a way, it is more impressive when people are poor, if they vote knowingly against their economic interests because of other values. Now, I have to say that I disagree with those values, but i do think that people voting for reasons other than economic issues is entirely reasonable.

Here, the article does not have the question Kerry was asked. It would seem to have been a question on why the Democrats were polling so poorly in upcoming races or why there was so much anger. Kerry could have simply ignored the question, but the comments are a set of things that he has been speaking of - and they are important issues. Only when taken completely out of context do they say anything that most people would have a problem with - even if they disagree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry's mistake has always been the same - the general
electorate doesn't do 'subtle'. He prefers the subtle, nuanced argument (much like Obama) and winds up getting crucified when the Rethugs and their pet MSM yank four or five words out of a two paragraph answer and beat him over the head with them until he's bleeding ("I was before it before I was against it").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. And people buying into RW interpretations has always been the same.
This wasn't a two paragraph response. It was a direct and accurate statement that has nothing to do with The Hill's ridiculous headline.

John Kerry is a magnet because the RW still sees him as a threat. He gets them press, and he has influence. Think about it: Why is a little known candidate in Delaware mentioning Kerry at events?

Greg Sargent does exactly what every actual Democrat should do: smack down RW distortions, not try to justify them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually, it was a several sentence answer to a question about Frank.
I agree with you, but it is true that, while I still dont know what was wrong with the sentence, it was taken out of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I hope
the NRSC does ask Democrats about this and I hope everyone of them mentions Fox News and the Politico poll.

That would be something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The problem is not subtlty - had he not spoken subtly and said the same thing
they would likely have had 4 or 5 more aggressive words to use. Consider what they have done - less energetically because he is less a threat - to Grayson's words. One thing of note here is that they can't really use Kerry's actual words in a video - because the actual words are not a problem. the inaccurate Hill and BH summations are.

The I voted for it, before i voted against it - was extremely unfortunate and was likely a product of Kerry's politeness more than anything else. He was asked the question at a live event and gave a great, detailed answer. He then was asked again, and rather than same "I answered that - next question", He said he had just answered it and then used the unfortunate phrasing. The problem is that that the media played dumb on it and ignored the many times Kerry explained to them that the text of the two bills was different. It was clearly the type of lapse of thought of how it could be used before it was said that is unavoidable if you are speaking close to 16 hours a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC