Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The rich guys don't want to pay the tax"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:30 PM
Original message
"The rich guys don't want to pay the tax"


Last night, "60 Minutes" had a segment on taxing the rich, mainly focused on the ballot initiative to be voted on tomorrow that would put in place a five percent income tax on individuals earning more than $200,000 annually or households earning more than $400,000 annually; the state does not have an income tax at the moment.

This was a particularly interesting exchange between correspondent Leslie Stahl and Bill Gates, Sr., father of the you-know-who:

"Businesses are saying they'll leave," Stahl pointed out.

"Yes. But the real truth of the matter is that the people that own businesses are the people who will be paying the tax. And my analysis is they don't want to pay the tax," Gates said. "The rich guys don't want to pay the tax."

"Are you saying you just think they're greedy?" Stahl asked.

"No," he replied. "They're defensive. I guess you could call it greed, I suppose. Wanting to not write another check, sure," Gates said.

"Steve Ballmer?" Stahl asked. "He's worth $14 billion. You don't think he..."

"He's a very fine guy, too. The fact of the matter is there are 43 states in this country that have a state income tax. And in those states, the Microsofts or the ABCs, whatever, have not fled the state. I mean, it's just a gross exaggeration," Gates said.

What was interesting about this exchange is two things. Gates is used to seeing rich people. He hears the unfiltered conversations. And he understand that all the blather about taxes hurting "competitiveness" are just full-out lies.

The final piece of the segment worth absorbing are the comments of David Stockman--yes, that David Stockman. As the implementing bureaucrat of the trickle-down economics "theory" during his stint as Reagan's OMB director, it was worth hearing this--though there is no admission of guilt about his role in creating the disaster we face:

But, as David Stockman will tell you, that attitude is hard to find. "We've demonized taxes. All right. We've created almost the idea they're a metaphysical evil," he said.

Still, he says there should be a one-time 15 percent surtax on the wealthy that he estimates would cut the national debt in half.

"In 1985, the top five percent of the households, wealthiest five percent, had net worth of $8 trillion, which is a lot. Today, after serial bubble after serial bubble, the top five percent have net worth of $40 trillion," he explained. "The top five percent have gained more wealth than the whole human race had created prior to 1980."

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/11/1/915768/-The-rich-guys-dont-want-to-pay-the-tax-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. IF a one-time 15 percent surtax on the wealthy would cut the national debt in half
What would be wrong with a one time 30 percent surtax on the wealthy?
The national debt was created by their tax breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. they probably won't like it when we start seizing assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. They can tax my middle class income 50%
if that will help pay off the national debt.
One or two years of severe austerity is no big deal for me.
I just do not want permanent high rates for health care.
Unfortunately that is where we are headed since the last HCR
bill has almost no cost reduction provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guggenheim Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. The sad part is that media owners are rich
Therefore they take the side of the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R'd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC