Kentucky SWEEP?

[GSLevel9]

Watching Nate's District by District guide... and the returns are very early... but it looks like BOTH key DEM districts are in deep shit.

[stray cat]

1. That fits the polling

[KingFlorez]

2. Dems only hold 2 seats in Kentucky

[GSLevel9]

5. yes, you're right I misread Nate's chart.

[alcibiades_mystery]

3. Oy. If Yarmuth falls, it's a tough night indeed

Keep your chins up, folks. We fought the good fight.

[Mortos]

4. with 1% of the returns in

That's like saying the view here sucks by standing in the shower at the beachfront hotel.

[Lost-in-FL]

6. Color me shocked. nt

[Bombtrack]

7. what's it gonna take to turn this this state around ?

I'm willing to help.

[Clio the Leo]

8. where exactly are you seeing this?

I want to see what you're seeing .... I dont disagree ... but cant find it

[GSLevel9]

9. @ 538 site Nate has a "District by District" "what to watch for" guide

and they have an interactive NYT map that shows the latest returns.

It's the coolest online site to watch returns.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/the-ultimate-hour-by-hour-district-by-district-election-guide/


http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/results/house

[Clio the Leo]

10. nevermind

I see it now. ;-)

[Thrill]

11. Not surprised. KY is a lost cause

.

[Lost-in-FL]

12. Just like FL. nt

[Arkana]

13. Chillax. We only hold two seats on the Congressional delegation, and

both of those are relatively safe. There's always the chance that R voter turnout is apocalyptically high, but I'd put good money on both Chandler and Yarmuth being in the 112th Congress.

[fasttense]

14. Has anyone noticed that with only 10% of the vote counted

they are calling the race for Rand Paul? Conway is only 13,000 votes down with 90% left to count. How can anyone call the race for Rand Paul so early unless they already know the outcome? This doesn't strike anyone as suspicious?

[PVnRT]

15. Chandler leads by six with 61% of precints reporting