Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Blue Dogs asked for and (mostly) got what they asked for from the Democratic Leadership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:24 PM
Original message
The Blue Dogs asked for and (mostly) got what they asked for from the Democratic Leadership
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 03:26 PM by CreekDog
-no public option
-a weaker health care bill
-strong limitations on choice in the health care bill
-no vote on tax cuts (because they didn't want to cut taxes for the non-rich at the expense of the rich)

this was all done to protect their electoral viability. and because the Blue Dogs were willing to use their numbers to kill outright any progress that they didn't like (and it seemed like they didn't like *any* health care reform at all.

perhaps we should ask the 23 of 46 Blue Dogs who have been successfully reelected how well that worked out for them.

and we should also ask if all the accomodation of their requests ended up weakening or watering down good policies to the extent that they were no longer very effective (stimulus, health care, financial reform, etc.)

i sure hope we don't take their word on what will be good for them (and us) in 2012.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and Recommended.
Here's what DFA had to say this morning:

"The fact is progressive heroes who lost last night like Russ Feingold and Alan Grayson became collateral damage in a toxic election environment created by weak leadership and corporate Democrats who refused to stand up and fight for real change. Progressives like Annie Kuster, Mary Jo Kilroy, and Tom Perriello ran some of the strongest grassroots campaigns in history, but were drowned out by unregulated corporate front groups that spent hundreds of millions to scare and lie to voters.

The biggest lesson from last night is actually pretty simple. For Democrats to win in the future, they need to fight for the people they represent and stop cutting deals to water down reform with the same corporate interests who will turn around and spend unlimited amounts of money to defeat Democrats year after year. "



Very depressing birthday for me today! (But not the first one).
That's the problem with early November birthdays.

Could be worse, could have my husband's birthday...April SIXTEENTH.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC