Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salvage the middle-class tax cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 10:31 PM
Original message
Salvage the middle-class tax cuts
or not.

The tax cuts expire December 31. Democrats have a more than 250 seat majority in the House and a 58-seat majority in the Senate through that date.

Where do you start the negotiations?

I'd start with middle-class tax cuts only, absolutely no extension of the tax cuts for the rich, and let Republicans counter.

If Republicans can't accept that the tax cuts for the rich are not on table, let all the tax cuts expire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Repukes would love that
They'd vote for (and have a scared shitless Senate affirm) a permanent extension of the Bush tax cuts for everybody, and dare the President to veto it, just as Americans would notice that their paychecks have been shrinking. My bet: he'd sign it.

If the lame duck Congress really wants to do something to help us, they can vote to raise the debt ceiling to a very sizable amount, so that the tea partiers cannot hold the country hostage in the next two years. However, I have my doubts that the defeated Democratic congresscritters would feel like doing the President any favors in the lame duck session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What would they love?
Your proposal: "They'd vote for (and have a scared shitless Senate affirm) a permanent extension of the Bush tax cuts for everybody, and dare the President to veto it, just as Americans would notice that their paychecks have been shrinking. My bet: he'd sign it."

Or the one in the OP?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's too bad Evan Bayh's retirement wasn't effective immediately
Via Ezra Klein

Sens. Evan Bayh and Kent Conrad have proposed a Bush tax cut compromise that's garnering GOP interest, reports John McKinnon: "Two top Senate Democrats floated the idea Tuesday of extending the Bush-era income-tax rates for a limited time only, and tying that move to an overhaul of the U.S. tax code or passage of policies to address the budget deficit. ... A spokesman for Rep. Dave Camp (R., Mich.), who is in line to become Ways and Means Committee chairman next year, said Mr. Camp preferred making the current rates permanent but has expressed a willingness to support a two-year extension 'and then use that time to work on fundamental tax reform.'"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Make them all, including Bayh and his ilk, filibuster tax cuts for the middle class
Of course, we know this is very unlikely to happen with the wimpy Dem leadership in the Senate--who apparently will be taking the lead on the expiring Bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let them all expire as retribution for the last election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. I totally agree with you. Why do you think Obama won't do it this way?
he is starting out the gate with a compromise that will likely extend the tax cuts for the rich for a couple years. And chances are republicans wont even agree to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe
he really wants to extend the middle-class tax cuts because now is not the time to increase taxes on Americans who are struggling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. But isn't it atleast worth a try? Still quite a bit of time. In addition...
someone made the point that he could use reconciliation which is absolutely true.

With all these options available to him I don't understand what he is doing. It makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. They can't use reconciliation
to extend them this Congress, and next Congress Republicans control the House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 04:02 PM
Original message
Ok, good point. but they could have used reconciliation earlier this year
surely it was clear then republicans would put up a fight.

And even if we take reconciliation off the table still doesn't make any sense that they don't try a middle class tax cut first and actually force a vote on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. They can only do it once per year
and they used reconciliation to pass the health care bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. But they weren't limited to just the healthcare bill? They could have stuck more provisions in there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I see a lot of people around here who seem to want him to just throw away his campaign
promise to not raise taxes on people making less then $250,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm not really sure what that has to do with this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Exactly
And I hope that is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. We agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC