Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another DUMB ASS decision by Obama this Debt Commission with mostly republicans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:10 PM
Original message
Another DUMB ASS decision by Obama this Debt Commission with mostly republicans
It's no surprise to me the decisions they just released on Social Security cuts.Now Obama has got a problem either he goes against his own Commission or he approves what they want.Can't wait to see how this unfolds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. What was his thinking when he chose the chairmen? Why does he never choose progressives...
...for anything??????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Obama is last of the Bluedogs
And that is the nicest way I can put it without getting yet another post deleted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes, that is a very nice way to put it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. Same here
On both counts. The delete dudes have been working overtime today. Now, let's see how long this takes to get deleted. Three...two...o-:nuke:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
54. That is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I caught a clip of an interview on CBS (?) and the interviewer asked why Obama
thought he'd lost a chunk of his base. Obama said essentially the same reason every one was discouraged -- the economy, jobs, etc. I can only speak for myself, but it's moves like this that just crush me. He hasn't lost me, but I'm just so baffled by some of his decisions. I want progressives surrounding him -- or at least an even mix!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It really is baffling! As a matter of fact, for me this kind of choice is unforgivable...
I don't know if the prez has lost his mind or if he's a con man - either way, he's lost his base all on his own.

I'm with you in that I want progressives surrounding him - that's why we elected him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. If BHO had wanted progressives surrounding him, he would have had progressives surrounding him.
Although most democrats seemingly are having a very hard time coming to grips with the reality of the situation, just how far right of center BHO has governed is evident in almost every one of his initiatives. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yep, good point. If he wanted them, that's who he'd have. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
49. The media is pushing daily
For him to put more republiCONS in his cabinet,so that they can leak even more lies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The unspoken rule: republicans must always get their way
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I think it's time for the people to get our way - time for the left to take over this party...
A caller to Big Ed's radio show today said it's time for labor and liberals and others to join together either to reform this party or start another and I couldn't agree more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. He does. DLCers and Blue Dogs are progressives too. DU rules even recognizes that.
Just b/c they are not far lefts and just b/c they agree with the far right on the war and the economy does not mean that they cant also be progressives.

They are too progressives and centrism is too working.

You far lefts with your labels and your purges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Oops, silly me! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
53. They agree with the right on the economy?
The right just totally collapsed the economy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Destroying Social Security one Democratic bad decision at a time.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The commission is not mostly Republicans,
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 02:14 PM by ProSense
the OP title is more fact-free screaming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. self-delete
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 02:40 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Par for the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. But this is POLITICAL CHESS don't you know
and the fact that millions of real people are now having their futures threatened by a commission
the guy who is supposed to have our asses covered appointed should make it all right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. What decisions did they release? This seems to be a power play by the chairmen to get things rolling
and the members don't seem willing to go along with it. So this may end up not being seen by Congress at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. The president appointed 6 members of the Commission, four Democrats and 2 repubs
and the House and Senate leadership in each party got to appoint three each.

So, if as you claim, the Commission is "mostly repubs" then either Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid appointed at least one repub (even though everyone they appointed caucuses with the Democrats), or some of the Obama Democratic appointees are really repubs. Which is it and who are the Democrats who are really repubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The facts won't get in the way of a good Dem bashing OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The commission was set up by Executive Order and its make-up was pre-determined to reach the desired
result. EOS :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. What decisions were just released?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. Commission Members -

Co-Chairmen:
Sen. Alan Simpson. Former Republican Senator from Wyoming.
Erskine Bowles, Chief of Staff to President Clinton

Executive Director:
Bruce Reed, Chief Domestic Policy Adviser to President Clinton

Commissioners:
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT)
Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA 31)
Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI 4)
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND)
David Cote, Chairman and CEO, Honeywell International
Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID)
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Ann Fudge, Former CEO, Young & Rubicam Brands
Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH)
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX 5)
Alice Rivlin, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institute and former Director, Office of Management & Budget
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI 1)
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL 9)
Rep. John Spratt (D-SC 5)
Andrew Stern, President, Service Employees International Union.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. OMG I feel SO sorry for Jan Schakowsky, having to hang with THAT gang of thieves!
Executive Director BRUCE REED?!?

W.T.F.


Hopefully she can escape to a corner of the
room with Dick Durban and Andy Stern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm sorry but you are mistaken. There are more Democrats than Republicans on the commission:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. 2 of them are Baucus and Conrad....
Yeah, so......not quite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. No kidding - the only thing Democratic about them is the D behind their names. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. They vote with the Democratic Caucus more often than Russ Feingold:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Conrad is for extending the tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans...
And Baucus? Surely you know what a gem Baucus is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Exactly. They support our wildly popular brand of centrist legisilation more than Feingold ever did.
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 03:44 PM by Dr Fate
And we need more of what happened in the past that lead up to our current victories, not less.

STAY THE COURSE!

I'm with you- I wish all these far lefts would stop saying that the centrism is not working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. LOL
You're on a roll lately.

Are you trying to get on the payroll?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Baucus and Conrad both vote with the Senate Democrats more than 90% of the time:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. They sure do...
As long as the legislation they are voting on has been financially and economically neutered to their liking.

Can you honestly say that their views economically speaking are a sufficiently progressive counterbalance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Ohhhh- I forgot- You still want a pony. So anyone who does not give you a pony is not progressive?
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 03:32 PM by Dr Fate
Just b/c a center-right centrist agreed with the far right on a few minor issues and did not give you a pony does not mean that they are not good progressives.

You are confusing progressive with farleftism and liberlism. We are not the party of Nader. Got it?

If you could just set aside your "values" and "facts" and just go along with us centrists for FIVE FREAKING MINUTES and let us get some work done with the other side, we can show you how to WIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. 'If you could just set aside your "values" and "facts"'
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Oh fucking brother.
I really hope this is a parody. If it is, then it's brilliant. But if this isn't satire then goddamnit is it pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. You dare suggest that a centrist on DU is not making sincere arguments?
I realize this is the perception that some far-lefts hold, but it is not fair.

Just b/c we say that we agree with whatever conservative swing voters say they agree with at any given moment does not mean we are not sincere about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. But they demand that it be stripped down to nothing first
Then take the GOP side on everything of importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. They are just making sure none of the weird far left stuff is in it. Thank God.
These guys vote with DEMS on war spending and on insurnace mandates, just like most other DEMS do. I have no idea why the far lefts have such a problem with all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Weird far left stuff?
What 'weird far left stuff' are you talking about? Fiscal sanity? Getting rid of supply side economics? Balancing the budget without raping social security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Exactly. What part of "America is a center right country" dont you understand?
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 04:18 PM by Dr Fate
We did not have the votes for all that stuff you mentioned, even if they really had been popular with the conservative swing voters that we must constantly court.

Here is what you farlefts dont get- centtrism is not about fighting for far left ponies- it's about COUNTING THE VOTES.

Centrists know how to count- Liberals/Naderites do not. We can and we WILL count all the other centrists who agree with us.

We do not fight for votes- we COUNT THEM. We counted them, and the numbers were not there for all that stuff farlefts wanted.

When you can learn how to count votes instead of thinking that it is our job to fight for votes, then maybe you will understand why you are not getting your far left ponies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. "We did not have the votes for all that stuff you mentioned"
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 05:37 PM by niceypoo
We dont have the votes for fiscal sanity? We dont have th votes for getting rid of supply side economics (Bush tax cuts)? No vote needed. We dont have the votes for balancing the budget without raping social security?

Wow, you are such a total coward.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Far lefts are but a teeny, tiny sliver of our base. The REAL DEM base are centrist activists..
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 05:42 PM by Dr Fate
...Reagan Democrats and conservative swing voters.

You know- the folks who get out and make it happen- as opposed to the far lefts who just sit around and wish for ponies and make us look like weak hippies.

In fact, I'm reluctant to even categorize far lefts as being in the DEM base. They secretly want to vote for Nader anyway.

No- no- America is a center right country- and if we are going to keep on WINNING, then we need to keep the Regan Democrats, conservative swing voters and other similar salt-of-the earth party loyalists inside the big tent. Organic granola munchers need not apply.

That means that we have to try to give THEM ponies. If we give out farleft ponies, we lose.

The 90's show us that we have to give out centrist ponies to win. Well guess what- the 90's are comming back, and when they do, I'll be here to say "I told you so."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. I'm pretty well convinced this is parody or sarcasm.
Reading all the responses to myself and to you and elsewhere in this thread it has to be. It's so over the top. I have to believe that is' satire because the only other option would be sociopathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Bull crap. I am from the Far-Center of the Big Tent.
You will not compromise my principles, whatever they may be at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Exactly. They support DEM's wildly popular brand of WINNING centrism all the time.
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 03:40 PM by Dr Fate
And it is certainly leading us to victory, despite all these far left lies.

For instance, these guys voted with DEMS on popular war spending and on the wildly popular insurance mandates, just like most other DEMS did. That is GOOD thing, right?

I have no idea why the far lefts have such a problem with all this.

Centrists and conservative DEMS are supporting, fighting for and then voting for their own centrist & conservative positions a huge percentage of the time- that should be a GOOD thing.

Jesus, can we get more centrists (AKA REALISTIC WINNERS) here on this board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. The commission is riddled with social security looters
Putting republicans on the commission was a foolish idea. All you will get from them is more of the same. The commission needs a 14 vote majority to agree on any proposals, an impossible number without giving away the farm to the republicans.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. The centrism IS TOO working! Stop saying that the Centrism is not working!!!
Jesus- dont you guys watch TV or listen to Obama's speeches?

Voters REJECTED all of your far left stuff in favor of centrism.

Far lefts: Dont you think you need to establish some credibility by being correct on an issue or two b/f you attack Obama's winning, centrist strategies?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Stick to purity speeches please, you really suck as a satirist.
ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. You dare suggest that a centrist on DU is not making sincere arguments?
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 05:49 PM by Dr Fate
That would be a strange thing indeed.

I may have to have a little word with the mods about this.

I'm not sure you are allowed to say "you really suck" to a centrist here at DU. I'll be checking on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. You've read the report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
56. Unrec...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC