Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's one issue that I support the tea party on.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:05 PM
Original message
There's one issue that I support the tea party on.
I read the other day that some members of the tea party are in favor of term limits on congress. I could fully agree with, I would also like to see pensions disappear for members of Congress.

I am thinking two terms for Senators and six for Representatives. Thus giving each chamber a max of twelves years.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I absolutely agree. I would be willing to bet there are some in
Wash DC who are taking medication for Alzheimer's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think
the teabaggers should get their way: There should be term limits for Republicans.

Democrats can continue voting people into or out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. We have term limits. They are called elections.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's not an election if it's a one man race. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Would you kick Ted Kennedy or Paul Wellstone out?
Edited on Fri Nov-12-10 10:26 PM by FSogol
I'd want then in forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If they served the maximum amount of terms? Yes. Kennedy could have more.............
than likely picked his replacement and supported that person, and they probably would of ran. I take nothing away from Kennedy has done, and his loss is tragic, but what happened to his seat after he died?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's bullshit...the GOP won in '94 with term limits as one of their issues
and once in power, they forgot about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I know it's a pipe dream, since it's congress that has to pass them, but ...........
I think it's worth the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Republicans used that ploy in the 90s.
The won control of Congress and all of a sudden weren't so interested in term limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Newt Gingrich played that one and showed that it is a false promise.
And term limits has it's problems. Just as you get someone who knows what he is doing, term limits hit. Yes, there are bad Representatives that we wish we could term limit out. But there are good representatives. Imagine if Edward Kennedy or Bernie Saunders had been limited to two terms in the Senate. Though states can establish term limits for elected officials, federal offices are defined by the Constitution. It would require a Constitutional amendment or Federal law to do that. And who will actually pass a law to limit the time he or she can occupy a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not as effective as it would seem
California has term limits for the state legislature and it hasn't made anything better, all you have is a lot of people with barely any experience running things. I do think Senate terms should be reduced to four years, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Four terms would put them at 24 years, I could live with that .........
my biggest problem with Congress are the arcane rules. I can live with the filibuster rule, as long as that each side were forced to actually filibuster.

Another problem is all the oversight committees. I would never argue to get rid of oversight committees, but we need to find a way to streamline them. We have entirely way too many that it makes them ineffective. I am not arguing for smaller government, but rather more effective government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think that would be wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Shouldn't the voters in each state get to keep good
representatives? The voters can choose now if they want to keep someone in or not...I don't like term limits...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pass meaningful campaign finance laws and this problem solves itself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. if they do that they they need to set up
public finance for every office so its a real job and not based on who gets the most money....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I would go for that. Level playing field for all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. So we can have more teaparty candidates replacing thinking statespeople?
And give them a change to destroy the country for another twelve years? No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC