Another stupid poll about 2012(will the Dems take back the house?)
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 05:19 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Another stupid poll about 2012(will the Dems take back the house?) |
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I wouldn't be surprised if a good portion of the teabaggers that won |
|
will be indicted for one thing or another before their terms are up. Think Allen West....ugh.
|
3waygeek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Note that House districts will be redrawn by 2012... |
|
which may or may not be to our advantage, depending on the state legislature's composition. Remember what Tom Delay & the Texas state legislature did 10 years ago?
|
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I expect anothr wave of discontent... |
|
but I won't even try to predict who will be punished by frightened voters.
Except that it will be the poor and middle class who pay.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. "Except that it will be the poor and middle class who pay." |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I doubt it. To take the majority, Democrats will have to win back seats lost by DU's hated Blue Dogs |
|
A fourth straight election with 20+ seats changing hands in the House would also be pretty spectacular.
Unfortunately I suspect that President will run far ahead of House Democrats in his reelection campaign. Not making a change at the top of the House leadership is going to be bad for candidate recruitment and electoral prospects next cycle.
|
KeyserSoze87
(309 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The Dems probably won't take back the House... |
|
but they probably will reduce the Republican majority by a great amount. Unfortunately, the Dems could lose the senate in 2012 if there are fewer teatards running.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Way too early to tell at this point.
|
budkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Wish it were so... but no. |
struggle4progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I myself usually can't see more than a few minutes into the future |
|
Two years is really beyond my powers
|
old mark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-10 06:22 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Barring an abrupt turnaround in the Democrat's policies of being GOP lite, |
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message |
11. It's too early to tell |
|
Even if it does happen, just more Blue Dogs to deal with
|
NorthCarolina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
12. If they run Progressive candidates they will. If they run New Dems/Blue Dogs...No. nt |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
13. In the house we are in a bigger hole than we were in '94 and it took dems 12 years to win back |
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
GSLevel9
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
Ter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
16. 41% are totally delusional |
|
Never in the country's history has any party lost 60+ seats and won the House and the following election lost at least 40+ and lost the House. With redistricting, it's all but impossible to lose before 2020.
|
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
Ter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-17-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Republicans picked up 55 seats and won the House in 1946, only to lose 75 seats and lose the House in 1948. I guess it's possible after all, my apologies!
|
Beacool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-16-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Nope, thanks to redistricting. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.