Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to GOP: How do you pay for tax cut extensions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:45 PM
Original message
Obama to GOP: How do you pay for tax cut extensions?
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/11/obama-to-gop-how-do-you-pay-for-millionaire-tax-cuts/1

When President Obama and the Republicans meet this week to discuss the George W. Bush tax cuts, he will have a question for them about extensions for the wealthy.

"If they feel very strongly about it, then I want to get a sense of how they intend to pay for it," Obama told reporters yesterday as Air Force One made its way back from Asia.

Obama supports extending the tax cuts for the middle class, but raises a deficit objection for Americans who make more than $200,000 a year, and couples who make more than $250,000.

"I believe it is a mistake for us to borrow $700 billion to make tax cuts permanent for millionaires and billionaires," Obama said. "It won't significantly boost the economy, and it's hugely expensive. So we can't afford it."
------------------

OK this is a smart strategy, use the GOP's supposed fiscal conservatism against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least we know he might ask the tough question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, this is good! (As long as they don't cave in the end, of course.) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. They haven't been willing to state what they wanted cut, specifically--
just general hair on fire about the deficit. Might be a good strategy, to try to pin them down and get them on record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Laying aside the policy merits (BAD) of a temporary extension of the taxcuts for the rich
It could end up being good politics, even though the policy merits are just plain bad.

Stay with me a moment before getting angry:

Taxcuts for those under $250K are made permanent, while taxcuts for the rich are extended until 2012.

2012. Yep, that 2012.

You know as well as I do that Republicans want those taxcuts to be made permanent. Now with the middle class tax issue settled, the other side will have to argue in favor of lower taxes for the wealthy and only the wealthy in the heat of a presidential campaign. The people will not support them. They won't be able to bundle the issue into lower taxes for the middle class.

Again, this is an argument based upon politics, not policy. I admit that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I posted over the weekend - They have to make a choice - cut the wars, or keep the tax cut permanent
Can't have it both ways.

That's Obama's ultimate move to force Republicans to expose themselves.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Grandma can eat cat food and go without heat. Easy to pay for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. good article. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. prelude to a cave.
"i believe it is a mistake..." are not strong words. The dems have huge majorities in the lame duck. If the tables were turned, does anyone really believe that the repugnants would waste huge majorities in the lame duck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well, So Far, They Haven't USED Much Of Anything... AND For That Matter I Haven't
seen much out of Obama to "think" he would DO BOLD! Even if what you are suggesting is even bold. I'd tell them WHAT'S good for America, stand by my PROMISE and say, I campaigned on this issue and I'm NOT willing to compromise!

But then I recall a song called "Dreamweaver" and it kind of reminds me of REALITY as it is today. That's how I see it, don't think there will be MUCH Standing Up for "we the people" by too many in the Administration OR The Congress. Dems OR Repukes!

JMHO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well d'uh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. This won't work because he'll be arguing on their terms.
Their response will be that tax cuts pay for themselves because it'll get the economy going again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. YEP ...
it does not matter that reality does not square to that point, it is what they say, and what the "liberal media" accepts as fact ...

When dealing with Rs, you have to state fact as fact, not ask them to advance whatever stunning bizarre false reality they have created ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. But
if businesses are paying less taxes (or, in most cases, not even what they LEGITIMATELY owe), then the question is still valid: how are the tax cuts getting paid for in the end? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. But I thought he already caved?
:wow:

I guess he hasn't.......yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's easy. Cut out waste, Social Security and Medicare. See? Easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC