Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guess the president

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:42 PM
Original message
Guess the president
We cannot afford to reduce taxes, reduce income, until we have in sight a program of expenditure that shows that the factors of income and outgo will be balanced.

All of us have heard this term 'preventative war' since the earliest days of Hitler. I recall that is about the first time I heard it. In this day and time... I don't believe there is such a thing; and, frankly, I wouldn't even listen to anyone seriously that came in and talked about such a thing.

A few families are fabulously wealthy, contribute far less than they should in taxes, and are indifferent to the poverty of the great masses of the people.... A country in this situation is fraught with continual instability.


I'm not trying to shove anything in anyone's face here, and this is certainly no idolizing endorsement of the speaker--the only thing this goes to show is how far our political discourse has changed on these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Guessing Eisenhower?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ...
Yep. Probably too easy--the more famous quotes had to be avoided. (Military industrial complex, Social Security and Texas millionaires, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. To be fair to Eisenhower, he wasn't a Republican out of any sort
of a fealty to an ideology. He was a Republican because a) he was pissed at the way Truman handled Korea, and b) he knew that getting elected President would be easier on the GOP ticket, even if it meant swallowing Richard Nixon as VP AND trying to take on the crazy isolationist wing of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He was a more reasonable stripe of small-government conservative
As far as social and domestic issues went, anyway. Of course, the bar has been set very low on that, but Ike certainly vaults right over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC