Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is wrong that the pat-down is "necessary"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 06:42 PM
Original message
Obama is wrong that the pat-down is "necessary"
The pat-down is only done to some people.

If it were necessary, it would be done to all.

It's not.

He should not say it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here
is what the President said if it helps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But the pat down, part of the security procedure that tests for explosions
is only consistently done to people who set off the metal detector.
============

TSA is ONLY CHECKING thoroughly the population of disabled people to make sure they don't have bombs on their persons. They aren't thoroughly checking everybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. But he didn't say what you claimed.
"I'm constantly asking them whether is what we're doing absolutely necessary..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. sure sounds like he said that it was necessary
certainly in many more words, but necessary nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. No, not the same thing.
Airport security wasn't invented by the TSA. There were always screenings.

The issue is to find ways to make the process, as the President said, less intrusive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. He said his security force, anti-terrorism experts ? (I forget who his
advisory group is) told him this is the best way at this time to ensure safety.

He did say he meets with them weekly and has instructed them to fine better, less intrusive ways, but we know how that goes...

MY question, when I heard him say this, is why don't you get the advice of people who truly ARE experts, like the Israelis? Not some home-grown committee. He needs additional input.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. while the israeli process doesnt have the patdowns, i think i read the process takes a few hrs to do
not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. And cost more, and ask personal questions /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. When you have compulsory service...

Then a good deal of your adult population has a military record in the first place.

There is a lot of internal security in Israel which makes the airport procedures the last step, not the first step.

Yes, if we had a broader surveillance state, internal checkpoints and more monitoring of people generally, then different balances can be struck.

Taking one element out of a culture and saying "That will work here" ignores the context in which that element operates.

Also Israel spends about $70 per passenger on security. Even now, in the US, we are spending about $6.

With ten times more money, there is probably a lot that can be done which is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well you present a very good argument. Thanks for opening my eyes to
see the bigger picture. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. What Obama's saying is that a strip search and/or pat down is necessary
Edited on Sat Nov-20-10 06:55 PM by high density
The nude-o-scopes are being installed at many airports and when you say no to those (or can't submit to one due to health reasons/etc) you get the automatic pat-down.

This is all because one guy out of 618,000,000 passengers last year had a bomb in his undies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and if that guy didn't set off the metal detector, he probably wouldn't have gotten scanned...
or patted down.

there's your security inaction!

but keep harassing the old ladies with insulin pumps --just don't get mad at us when we laugh at you when you say it's helping. it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If terrorists are making it to the airport, it seems too late to me
By all means xray our bags and let us walk through a magnetometer, but I don't see how strip searching or groping us provides any additional security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. They need a Wasp tunnel
Edited on Sat Nov-20-10 07:22 PM by Politicalboi
Wasps can detect explosives. No need to be groped or x-rayed.

http://www.robaid.com/bionics/wasp-hounds-sniff-explosives-and-illegal-drugs.htm

And here's another one. Bees are amazing.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_7_174/ai_n30887058/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I can't subject my mother to this because....
She has dementia and is a cancer survivor. She had had her bladder taken out so she's wearing urine bag now under clothes. We won't fly now. It would freak her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cavity search will be necessary
As soon as a serious terrorist blows up a plane after putting an explosive up his/her own ass to get on the plane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Easy fix to this. Have everyone walk through a device that -
- detonates explosives on the spot. You'd find any explosives and get rid of the creep at the same time so he/she wouldn't waste our time and money cluttering up our court system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. how is using something that doesn't exist "easy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Sorry to say things are so out of hand I like your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC