Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When progressives help Drudge spread lies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:28 AM
Original message
When progressives help Drudge spread lies
From today's NYT:


If a squadron of mad scientists surrounded by supercomputers gathered in a laboratory to try to conjure a single news topic that would blow up large, they could not touch the T.S.A. pat-down story.
It began with a Drudge Report link to a video on Nov. 13 of an intrusive pat-down, and then leapt to social media and the rest of the Web.

___________

Cue the media mushroom cloud: by Tuesday, there were print reports about the new scanning technology, heavy-breathing blog posts about the government using the technology to alter or gather DNA (yow), and every cable channel featured wall-to-wall speculation about what would happen when people got to the airport on Wednesday and how many would be carrying lanterns and pitchforks.

“This story tapped right into the central nervous system of the collective consciousness,” said Mark Ghuneim, chief executive of Trendrr. “It was huge.”

But then, in the real world, nothing happened.

A few passengers opted out and, if anything, lines were shorter because airport security was staffed up and people arrived early just in case.


_________________________________________________

The pat-down story was the equivalent of vaporware — it seemed as if something huge was about to happen, but it turned out that it was a story about a story, the noisy, fervent sound of a news system feeding on itself.



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/business/media/29carr.html?_r=2



But hey. let's impeach Obama!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. 'cue the media mushroom cloud'
Perfect. And then add the poutrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Oh, I love it when you say "poutrage"!
It makes me feel so ashamed of having my own opinions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, brother.
Not much happened on 'opt-out' day because TSA just didn't require many x-rays or gropings ... how hard is that to figure out?

But more to the point of the title of the OP -- how about "When progressives abandon fighting for civil liberties just because Drudge latches onto a legitimate outrage"?

New flash ... anything that the federal government does that turns out to be bad does not mean there is some kind of right-wing conspiracy to "impeach Obama". Sometimes, as in the TSA fearmongering, the federal government is just wrong and needs to be called to task by both the left and the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. What an excuse
If the protest were so widespread, someone could have gotten to do it on such a heavily traveled day.

So is the protest going to continue to a day where the TSA allegedly is requiring its regulations?

Talk about being persecuted. They can't even protest because the government refuses to do its evil deeds! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. what did Drudge 'latch onto' during the Bush years....
I don't recall much cheering the good ole Drudge in those days.

o please spare me. us. the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's easy for you all to say.
For us minorities who have been the target of these pat-downs since 9/11, it's not something that is easily dismissed. It was bad enough to have my breasts touched before this upgraded pat-down began, but to have to decide between sexual abuse or physical damage when the radiation screenings began--that was too much. The only consolation was that everyone had to go through it, this time. Despite what you say, I think people are very angry about this. At this point, the NYTIME's reporting is very effy. Not since the Judy wotshername fiasco, do I take them as a reliable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. everyone had to go through it
that is the ONLY reason this blew up in the media. In fact, a big reason it bothers a lot of people is that minorities are the ones doing much of the patting down. A lot is being made, on RW radio, of the fact of how many TSA employees are black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Radiation is radiation.
People need to refuse to have their health compromised by the TSA! Also, like it or not we have many people who have been physically abused, adults and children, and they deserve to know what to expect from these exams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They should not fly then
Where they will get a lot more radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Like it or not this stuff accumulates.
Yes we are exposed to it when we fly but these folks propose to use them on trains, subways, at ball fields. You name it they want them them. We have to make a stand on this issue. First they take our health care and then they radiate us at every turn. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. delete, wrong spot
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 11:49 AM by stevenleser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. NYT's further demise.....
As Glen Greenwald so clearly pointed out when asked which of the five newspapers he went to, to begin perusing the Wikileaks material--it sure as hell wasn't the NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. of course since Bush is now gone, the media is back on track
and honest and we should always believe every Balloon Boy story they have for us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. many of the "progressives" you meet on the net are poseurs
Edited on Mon Nov-29-10 03:05 PM by Uzybone
they suck at the same teats as RW idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. There isn't much difference between left and right wingers
The comedy they provide is priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. So what are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. obviously a "new"democrat...
because only a "new" democrat would say something that patently stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Ain't that the damn truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Tell it to the "federal employees make too much" crowd here.
Oh wait...President Obama supports that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC