Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I, for one, think freezing federal salaries is a good thing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:09 AM
Original message
I, for one, think freezing federal salaries is a good thing
I think that the Republicans will finally see that we are a partner that they can work with.

My only concern is that the co-chairs of the deficit commission called for a three-year freeze, not two years, so that's one thing Obama could have done better. I hope that the other co-chair's other recommendations are fully implemented, or else the Republicans might not trust us as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's the one thing we should aspire to be...
accepted by Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. I see what you did there.
The problem with that approach, though, is that you can't out-republican a republican. The parties will just keep lurching to the right, and we will all be worse off because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. George Lakoff,anyone?
from JULY 08,2010..prescient, or what??

http://www.truth-out.org/disaster-messaging61170



Democrats are constantly resorting to disaster messaging. Here's a description of the typical situation:

* The Republicans out-message the Democrats. The Democrats, having no effective response, face disaster: They lose politically, either in electoral support or failure on crucial legislation.

* The Democrats then take polls and do focus groups. The pollsters discover that extremist Republicans control the most common ("mainstream") way of thinking and talking about the given issue.

* The pollsters recommend that Democrats move to the right: adopt conservative Republican language and a less extreme version of conservative policy, along with weakened versions of some Democratic ideas.

* The Democrats believe that, if they follow this advice, they can gain enough independent and Republican support to pass legislation that, at least, will be some improvement on the extreme Republican position.

* Otherwise, the pollsters warn, Democrats will lose popular support - and elections - to the Republicans, because mainstream thought and language resides with the Republicans.

* Believing the pollsters, the Democrats change their policy and their messaging and move to the right.

* The Republicans demand even more and refuse to support the Democrats.


We have seen this on issues like health care, immigration, global warming, finance reform, and so on. We are seeing it again on the Death Gusher in the Gulf. It happens even with a Democratic president and a Democratic majority in both houses of Congress.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Please - the sarcasm is a bit subtle - add a smiley to prevent head explosions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If I do that, it won't have the same effect
People should think a little about what the President's strategy is here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Personally, I no longer think he has a strategy
he just reacts to what the Rethugs want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. I think here, Obama knows what he's doing.
I support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes. We can all partner with the push downward.

Roll Back the Reagan Tax Cuts
Monday 22 November 2010
by: Thom Hartmann, Berrett-Koehler Publishers | Book Excerpt

This is the third installment of Tom Hartmann's groundbreaking book, "Rebooting the American Dream: 11 Ways to Rebuild Our Country."
http://www.truth-out.org/roll-back-reagan-tax-cuts65332



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. ...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does this include the Congressional salaries, and that of their staff as well?
Edited on Tue Nov-30-10 08:24 AM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, it does not include Congress
Separation of powers between the Executive and Legislative branches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How do the tbaggers justify that??? Aren't all salaries part of the budget and therefore
contributory to the problem? No doubt, Congress will give itself a nice raise in the next couple of years..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm a federal employee and I agree. In talking with my colleagues about this issue, we all agreed
that while it's a good idea to place the freeze, we believe that the president used us as a scapegoat. Federal employees are an easy target. The Republicans keep pushing this lie that we get paid more than our private industry counterparts. (Note that this is the same lie that is being peddled at the state level against state employees and unions.)

The president used federal employees to make a political point. That's what we have a problem with. Don't use us as fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sure. Hurt the civil service worker.
I notice how a freeze in wage increases won't stop Congress from getting their wage hikes as planned.

This freeze would save 50 billion in 10 years. That's 2 months of the war in Afghanistan if you wanted a comparable.

Disclaimer:
I'm not a civil service worker and nobody in my family is either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. There could finally be some bipartisianship in DC.
And Obama is doing his role. HOpefully, the repubs do their role in this matter.

It could be a new day...a new dawn...a new America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. There will never be bipartisanship in DC.
The repuks want sole control over us and will stop at nothing to get it. They lie cheat and bear false witness against anything that will prevent them from turning this country over to the corporations. I hate every one of them. Watch the little twerps that the repuks are sending out to the talk shows. They are so brain washed that they look like zombies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. "I hate every one of them. "
well there won't be with that attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. How about everyone in govt., from Obama right down the line
Why single out just one group? That isn't fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The President's salary has been frozen since 2001. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. He must be the only one. I want congress and the cabinet to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. Furlough the Catfood Commission.
Bi-partisan cutbacks at their finest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. You almost got me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Obama De-Stimulus.
I agree, Manny.
The LAST thing this economy needs is Money in the hands of Working Class people that will SPEND it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. That 100-year old lady working at WalMart
clearly illustrates that people are working longer, and therefore raising the retirement to the same age as Simpson is a good idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. She may be one of those "uniquely American" folks that has SEVERAL
jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. So do I. The Fed government has a huge deficit. When private
companies don't do well, employees don't get raises or bonuses. I have personally experienced pay freezes in the private sector on more than one occassion. Why would Fed employees be emempt for this type of action?

I work for a large private company who has cut salary increases to 2 percent across the company for the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yes, although I think we both agree that the executives should be exempt
Because it's a market reality that top executives will work somewhere else if they are not compensated really, really well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Sure they do just look at Wall Street.
The bigger the fuck-up, the bigger the bonus.

Then to top it off, taxpayers give them money that could be used to pay government salaries. Not to mention that the government has purposely cut their revenue stream with tax cuts. My wife works for a government entity in Floriduh. After Jebthro Bush cut out the intangibles tax, a tax on wealth (only 0.25%) on holders of stocks and bonds of over $500k, my wife has had raises the last 3 years of 0%, 0.25%, and 0.75%. And her high paying government job paid a whopping $22k last year.

You guys remind me of the old Dylan song, "It's all right Ma". He ain't interested in getting any higher, just dragging you down in the same ditch he's in.


Get us a primary candidate Please!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. LOL.
:rofl:

Well played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. This will not extend to the tens of millions of federal contractors who are in bed with the GOP.
The GOP loves to spend federal monies on their projects, but they're sure that those projects are not government employees on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. But this is NOT a traditional Dem position.
Even if it is a good idea, as I believe helping the unemployed is far far more important. The point is that this being more of a repuker position we gave it away without getting anything in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC