Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eight GOP senators vote to keep earmarks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:38 PM
Original message
Eight GOP senators vote to keep earmarks

Eight GOP senators vote to keep earmarks

By Jordan Fabian

Eight Republican senators on Tuesday voted to preserve earmark spending despite pressure from the Tea Party movement.

Sens. Thad Cochran (Miss.), Susan Collins (Maine), James Inhofe (Okla.), Dick Lugar (Ind.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Richard Shelby (Ala.) voted against an amendment to food-safety legislation that would have enacted a two-year ban on the spending items. Retiring Sen. George Voinovich (Ohio) and defeated Sen. Bob Bennett (Utah) also voted against it.

Senate Republican had already passed a voluntary earmark ban, but Tuesday's vote shows that the conference is still divided over the issue. The overall Senate proposal failed 39-56.

Even though earmarks represent a small portion of overall discretionary spending, Tea Party activists have pressured lawmakers to outlaw the practice, saying it is a good way to start reining in high spending.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love how Bennett is sticking it to thew Tea Party here
They ousted him in Utah's preposterous "primary" system, when he would have clearly won the general. Hell, I thought Bennett might have won a write in, a la Murkowski. Now he's sticking a finger in their eye. Kind of amusing.

Wonder what the Tea Imbeciles will think of Inhofe's vote here. He certainly fits their mold in the batshit, anti-science department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Tea imbeciles"..wow, that is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for them. This was the correct vote. Earmarks should be debated and voted upon.
But they should not necessarily be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just a 2 year ban. Hahahahaha!!!!!!! Like they thought they could stall it until 2012!
"Then, when we get the White House back 2 years from now, the earmarks will expire, and we can run up the bills!"
"Good plan, Mitch."
"Yeah, I thought so."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoechen Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Luger
Don't worry...Luger is going to get primaried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kabuki.
Earmarks aren't going anywhere.

We need publicly financed campaigns now!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC