|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:20 PM Original message |
GOP to invite Dems to join in reading of the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dems should get to read The Bill of Rights, the 13th Amendment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. If I were they I'd send our regrets due to "previous commitments" or whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. That's a political nightmare. They'll be seen as scoffing the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Yeah, I know. It would just FEEL good to pass on it. Again, they have us over a barrel. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Was just thinking the same thing. "Sorry, but got matters of the nation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. as we've been told dems need to be more bipartisan so should they join in? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
randr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. Of course this is an attempt to gain the "constitutional" high ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. We should have offered to help read before they asked us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. This is a good thing. Repugs wanted to use this to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3waygeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. Of course they asked the Dems to join in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. LOL - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Not to mention help with the Constitution itself. They don't seem to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
13. Oh, goody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is a lovely Bi-Partisan Idea...and I think it could work well for both Dems & Repugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. Dems should say "Let's start with the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
16. The whole thing is stupid but the Dems should join |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
17. What's not to like? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC