Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rationale Behind Cantor's Dishonesty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 04:40 PM
Original message
The Rationale Behind Cantor's Dishonesty
Strong stuff coming from Steve Benen.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_01/027399.php


THE RATIONALE BEHIND CANTOR'S DISHONESTY.... No matter how shameless congressional Republicans might be, the health care repeal push creates at least a little awkwardness.

For two years, the GOP has pretended to care deeply about the deficit and fiscal responsibility. And yet, in their very first week as the new House majority, these same Republicans have decided to push a repeal of the Affordable Care Act, which would add more than $100 billion over the next decade.

How would Republicans pay for this? They wouldn't -- in fact, they're creating an exception to their own rules, which they just created, that allows them to pursue repeal without regard for adding to the deficit that they pretend to consider important. It's quite a way to start a new majority.


Asked to justify this, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) has an explanation.

"...I think most people understand that the C.B.O. did the job it was asked to do by the then-Democrat {sic} majority, and it was really comparing apples to oranges," Mr. Cantor said. "...Everyone knows beyond the 10-year window, this bill has the potential to bankrupt this federal government as well as the states."


In Cantor's mind, the CBO score showing significant deficit reduction is wrong, because Democrats cooked the books, creating "10 years' worth of tax hikes and six years' worth of benefits." As such Republicans can repeal the entirety of the bill and not break their promise.

Cantor is either deeply confused or is deliberately telling falsehoods. For one thing, if Cantor were telling the truth, his caucus wouldn't have to waive its own budget rules in order to pass the repeal bill. For another, if the argument were legit, Republicans wouldn't be afraid to submit the repeal bill to the CBO for a score. For that matter, as Ezra Klein explained today, "{W}hat Cantor is saying just isn't true" when one looks at the original CBO report the Majority Leader is referencing.

But the issue here isn't just Cantor's demonstrably false argument. It's why he's making it.

...Cantor and the GOP know full well that the bill is unpopular largely because people think it increases the deficit. Polls have shown that only 15 percent of Americans know that CBO said it will reduce the deficit. If, in the repeal fight, it becomes widely understood that the bill reduces the deficit, it will become more popular. So it's crucial, as the repeal effort goes forward, for Republicans to become much more brazen in falsely asserting that the bill doesn't really reduce the deficit, and that even if the CBO does say it reduces the deficit, that they're saying that because they've been tricked somehow. But CBO wasn't tricked. If it were, Cantor, who has a staff dedicated to figuring these things out, would have a better argument than the one he's offering.


The moral of the story: confronted with an awkward political dispute, and evidence of Republicans violating their own stated principles with their own legislative agenda, the new majority isn't above lying.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that the guy who tried to parlock a "terrorist attack" against a GOP office? -nt
Edited on Wed Jan-05-11 04:42 PM by Commie Pinko Dirtbag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Magus Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cantor is lying?
In related news, fire is hot and water is wet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm wondering what part of the constitution they will reference for this repeal.
With their new wacko rule that all the bills will have to cite the constitution to establish authority we will be seeing some weird new use of the english language I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. The reason for Cantor's dishonesty is clear: he's a Repuke.
And a particularly disreputable one, at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC