|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
LeftyAndProud60 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 06:52 PM Original message |
Why hasn't Ginsburgh stepped down? Shouldn't she be playing ball? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well. That was thoroughly cryptic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. OP is wondering why SC Justice Ginsburg hasn't stepped down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. She prefers chess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. Why? Obama won't nominate anyone nearly as good as RBG! (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyAndProud60 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Um, she's old and recovering from cancer. And there is no guarantee Obama will win re-election. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. don't you have something to do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Now address my point: Her replacement won't be as useful to our side as she is. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Yeah, those Sotomayor and Kagan chicks turned out to be REAL duds amirite guyz? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. They're not bad, but they are *NOT* Ginsburg. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think she's waiting for the other shoe to drop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Callous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. Piece of Shit thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 09:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. +1,000,000 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. Why should she step down? Her health has improved and she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Empowerer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. Because she was appointed for life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. You think it is easy to give up the power & prestige of SCOTUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-11 01:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
26. The pay is meager compared to what you can make on the lecture circuit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
13. She's only 77. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
14. Oh that's classy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
namahage (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
15. Your concern is noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. At least spell her name right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. +a really big number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Ummm, it's hard to take you serious. The election is next year. It's currently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Nov. 2012 is 22 months away (2 months less than 2 years) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You mean Nov. 22nd of next year? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-11 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
25. The administration just barely finished getting the Kagan confirmation through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-11 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
27. No she shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-11 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
29. i think if you want to weigh in on her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-11 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
30. I guess it's all about politics........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC