|
individuals pay for their own insurance and go ahead cut insurance for those that CAN'T afford it? Is that somehow just and better? Doesn't seem like much of a threat, and I can see them en masse agreeing to do just that and make headlines about their 'honesty' and feeling less guilty about denying coverage for millions. They'd be out 15K per year each, but that's pennies to most of them.
I don't even think the comparison is right...they get health coverage from their employers (us). That's not really a government program. Most Americans are and will continue to be covered through their employers. Maybe I'm looking at it from a wrong angle, but I don't see equivalency.
I think the better approach is to point out the flaws in the existing system, the huge costs due to profit and protection of corporations, the fact that many countries do much better than we do and for less cost, that no other industrialized country allows for-profit insurance for basic care, how many people suffer and die due to lack of coverage or cost of care, the JOB-KILLING cost of health care, the stagnant middle class wages that are due in part to increases in cost of health benefits, etc etc. The reasons for reforming insurance and health care are good enough to stand on their own without giving the gop a way out by simply buying their own insurance.
I don't mean to throw a wet blanket on pointing out gop hypocrisy...go ahead and brow beat them with anything you have. I just don't think demanding they give up congressional health care is a strong point...and I do think it's a risky one.
|