|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:17 AM Original message |
Obama: "Raising the retirement age |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. OMG Starvation!!11!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Uh.... what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:48 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. We have more troops in Germany than Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. That works, as long as you don't count the mercenaries... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. We have tons of contractors in Germany, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Are troops still being killed in combat operations in Germany and Japan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 09:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Death continues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 09:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I said combat operations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. It depends on who is labeling it, I suppose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echotrail (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
33. Apples and oranges. Here's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:30 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Slight correction: We have mercs all over the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. 800 bases and a million soldiers all over the globe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
50. Germany & Japan are still not secure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
55. Then get the fucking legions of empire the fuck out of all those places!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. you just got pwned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:56 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. I think you responded to the wrong post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
44. pretty much....but kneejerk posts like that do make the ignore feature valuable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
47. No doubt RA means Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fruittree (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 06:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Thank you - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 09:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. We have 50,000 troops in Iraq along with a huge army of highly paid mercenaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Elevenses1!1! !... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
54. Over 100,000 troops and contractors garrisoned in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
2. Starving? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Deleted message |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:08 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. In the bloody, violent, evisceration and castration of message boards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. if they have a job. the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
18. The people who are hurt by raising the retirement age... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:10 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Exactly. Bankers live longer now so miners must work longer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. ^ Exactly so ^ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
57. Deleted message |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. Another group hurt by raising the retirement age would be unemployed younger workers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Yes, that is another reason why it's a bad idea. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
24. Deleted message |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
56. I see you don't remember history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
3. You're twisting what he said. Of course it's an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 09:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
14. it basically won't stop the republican congress from doing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. He needs to say that it is a bad choice, instead of this BS wishy-washy finger pointing crap. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
9. Deleted message |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
12. Not only is it an option its being done right now.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyBoring (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 12:13 AM Response to Reply #12 |
37. Very good point! Retirement age for most people is already 67. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. Some folks on the left save their outrage for when a Democrat is in office. I dont understand it but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #46 |
58. So you are among those of us who realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. if he said that, I believe he intends to do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tutankhamun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Exactly. "...not he best option..." is Obama language for"Go ahead and do it, GOP." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
43. Deleted message |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
16. This had to be rec'd. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trayNTP (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
27. Lowering the retirement age is probably a better policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. honoring the promises to those who have served and contributed...not a priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-11 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
31. Give me a break. Obama does not want to starve older people or anyone else for that matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Allowing Social Security eligibility to be raised AGAIN is also not helpful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
60. Yep, he's just clueless and ignorant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
39. Raising the retirement age certainly IS an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
40. relax...they're not planning on starving us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #40 |
59. You've got that right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeroTwins (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
42. after you're done with your tantrum. Check out some pictures from Africa for real starvation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
45. hookay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
48. "cat food...(blah blah blah)...cat food..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
61. What part of raiding "entitlements" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. What part of wild-eyed demagoguery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
53. We live in a country in which workers in their 50s are now routinely laid off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. It's too bad the Nixon Admin was prevented by the Dixiecrats (mostly) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-11 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
63. He used to say insurance mandates were not an option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC