|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 03:47 PM Original message |
Why should Connecticut have 2 senators anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah! At least one house of Congress should be based on state population! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. States who consistently elect troublemakers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. By that rationale, Connecticut would be way down the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I guess tongue in cheek is a fail around here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I know you're not being totally serious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. lol, well at least today it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. If that were the case Massachusetts would have lost representation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. Because the Constitution says so -- and also says that requirement cannot be amended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconocrastic (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. We don't need no freakin' constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. We could use a new one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. We didn't have one for eight years.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. The constitution is outdated, and it isn't easy to vote out Lieberman because most of us have no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-15-09 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. There shouldn't even be a Senate. The bicameral legislature is a vestige of the House of Lords. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC