George Allen to Announce Plans for Senate Bid on MondayFormer Republican Senator George F. Allen of Virginia will announce Monday that he will seek to avenge his narrow loss in 2006 at the hands of Senator Jim Webb, two senior Republicans in Virginia told The Caucus.
“He’s calling himself the original Tea Partier,” said one senior Republican, who asked not to be named because Mr. Allen has not yet made his plans public. “A lot of the old gang is helping.”
Mr. Allen’s political career was abruptly ended four years ago after a campaign that became synonymous with the new era of YouTube politics.
After the image of Mr. Allen calling a young Democratic operative “macaca” was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, the senator lost his reelection bid by about 9,000 votes. (See the video below.)
Mr. Allen, who in 2006 was considered a leading contender for the Republican nomination for president in 2008, never ran for the office after his re-election to the Senate faltered.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/23/george-allen-to-announce-plans-for-senate-bid-on-monday/ “He’s calling himself the original Tea Partier”. He was calling Dems racial epithets before the Tea Party made it cool again.
I have to admit that I kind of love the fact that George Allen is going to be on the Virginia ballot at the same time as Barack Obama.
I hope Webb does not try to pull a bunch of crap re "distancing" himself from the President. Barack Obama won Virginia much more comfortably then Webb did.
There will certainly be no lack of motivating candidates on the ballot in 2012 in VA.
edit to add - Maybe the head of their ticket will be Haley Barbour running against President Obama - why not just go completely Boss Hawg on the Republican line.
From Blue Virginia Blog - this is before the big Obama polling turn around but after the very legislatively successful Lame-Duck session:
Is Jim Webb a Shoo-In for Reelection in 2012? by: lowkell
Fri Dec 31, 2010 at 10:08:44 AM EST
If Jim Webb decides to seek reelection in 2012, is he a shoo-in?
Based on this superb analysis, on a pro-Republican blog no less, I'd have to say "yes." Ugh.
It's not even 2011 and that's my sentiments about the 2012 Republican nomination battle. While most of the state is not paying attention to this intra-party nonsense, the posturing by the candidates and soon-to-be candidates has been awful. There's no other word for it, simply awful from top to bottom. With the selection of a primary, the stage was set for former Senator George Allen to ascend. Bob Marshall and Jamie Radtke's only chances were a convention, so with State Central opting for a primary, that in theory would have preempted any candidacy. Whoops.
The analysis goes on to conclude that George Allen, aka "the man we know and love as 'Felix Macacawitz'", is the strong, odds-on (1:3) favorite for the Republican nomination to face Webb in 2012. But not before "the uncomfortable prospect of
scorched earth, 'anyone but Allen'" contest that makes this a "long year" for Republicans. And at the end of the GOP nomination process, we get a clueless, unrepentant George Allen, which means we start with "macaca," we continue on with his apparent shame over having Jewish heritage, we recall his habitual use of the "n word" and other shenanigans (deer head in a black family's mailbox, noose in his office, love for the Confederate flag), we then proceed with his 97% voting record with George W. Bush, onward to his utter lack of accomplishments - and disdain for - the "wounded sea slug" of a U.S. Senate, etc, etc. And all this will come in a presidential election year, with President Obama on the top of the ticket and looking like a strong favorite for reelection.
Given all this, how does "Felix Macacawitz" improve his 2006 performance and beat Jim Webb, who would start this time with staff, money, and incumbent advantages? I have no idea, but if anyone thinks of anything, please let me know. Until then, I'm penciling in Jim Webb as a "shoo-in" for reelection in 2012. That is, assuming he decides to put himself through the torture of running, of attending events, of kissing babies, of doing call time, and generally of doing the thing he hates most in the world - being a politician.
http://www.bluevirginia.us/diary/2725/is-jim-webb-a-shooin-for-reelectionComments:
Not a lock (0.00 / 0)
But if Webb decides to run for re-election he is going to be benefit tremendously from having Obama's operation to help him. Obama will be able to bring out the 20% of the African-American population of VA and turnout will be high. While Obama is not a lock to win VA, Webb stands to benefit a lot by the high turnout of voters in NoVa who stayed home for a significant amount in 2009 and 2010. There is no doubt that VA will be seriously contested by both sides. In 2008 Obama's national winning percentage most closely approximated the margin in VA.
I don't want to give the GOP advice but they need to dump Allen and these tea party loons. VA is a purple state whose demographics are not turning in their favor. They should nominate an empty suit like Rob Whittman or Bill Bolling who people don't have a clue about them but they won't. They are going to go with someone who they love but who is repulsive to the general population.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by: Cool_Arrow @ Fri Dec 31, 2010 at 09:25:40 AM CST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by: you @ soon
To post this comment click here:
Otherwise click cancel.
You must enter a subject for your comment
I agree, "generic Republican" would be stronger (0.00 / 0)
than Radtke, Marshall, Stewart, or "Felix Macacawitz." But for right now, those seem to be the most likely Republican candidates. If any one of them is the nominee, I'd put Webb's chances of reelection pretty darn high.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by: lowkell @ Fri Dec 31, 2010 at 09:45:20 AM CST
Geez - reading some of those comments makes me hope Tom Perriello runs again. I love him.