|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:05 PM Original message |
BREAKING-IL Supreme Court issues stay on Emanuel ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Very_Boring_Name
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oooooh boy, can't wait to see how all the gloaters from yesterday will take this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Same here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young but wise
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yessssssssss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. His name might still be on the ballot, but the appeal will decide if he is elligable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
39. Dream on. Nobody is going to nullify the result of the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
6. Keeping his name on the ballot was key. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Just heard from Andrea MItchell that they feared how this appellate court would rule, so they had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. To be eligible to run you must both be a resident AND live here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. i guess that depends on what it means to live somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. States decide who can and can't run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. my point really is more about travel vs residency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. THat we agree upon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Rahm's job was not in Chicago, he had a permanent job in DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. The law does not say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Thanks for setting that straight. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 04:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Very nice! Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. This scenario explains why the wingnuts pack the courts but are dragging their feet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I guess they started printing ballots last night but the stay requires he be on the ballot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. So I guess this means that those ballots already printed are invalid? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GinaMaria
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. wouldn't be tragic if you live in Chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. 2 Judges who ruled him ineligible yesterday had ties to (candidate) Chico |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Do you realize 95% of the judges in Cook County are slated by the Cook County Democratic Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. The Tribune wrote the story, not me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. There are no independent judges in Cook County (Chicago). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. i think you are exactly correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. Well, Of Course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. What do you mean by that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
25. Good; the alternative would have been absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
30. Good. Best of luck, Rahm! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
31. I have mixed feelings about Rham being on the ballot and I am not going to vote for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. "Rham" ISN'T on the ballot. Rahm is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. oops well I'm not voting for him either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Darn. I thought there may have been a "Rham" that you were talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
32. heh. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Tue Jan-25-11 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
35. Has anyone considered the impact of the appellate court on the Homeless? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC