Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid's results

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:28 PM
Original message
Harry Reid's results
Harry Reid's results



Yglesias makes the case for Harry Reid:

Liberals have rarely found themselves hailing Reid’s leadership. But the fact of the matter is that there’s almost no precedent for the legislative mission he’s been asked to accomplish of turning 59 Democrats, one loosely Democrat-aligned Independent, and two slightly moderate Republicans into 60 votes for a package that’s simultaneously a dramatic expansion of the welfare state and a measure that reduces both short- and long-term deficits.

On top of the intrinsically difficult nature of the task, he’s facing a really ugly political situation back home. Because Beltway mores dictate that you can never hold a member of congress morally culpable for actions undertaken in the name of raw politically self-interest, it must have been very tempting for Reid to get distracted. But he’s stayed on point and focused, dealt with the timid members of his caucus, dealt with the ignorant members of his caucus, dealt with the egomaniacal members of his caucus, and dealt with the all-too-typical Senatorial combination of policy ignorance, egomania, and political cowardice among some members. For his troubles it looks like we’re going to get a bill that liberals feel churlish about at best. But it’s really an extraordinary achievement.



People often compare Reid to Pelosi, and not favorably. But Pelosi got 50.5 percent of her chamber to vote for health-care reform. Reid looks like he'll get 60 percent. That's not to make the reverse comparison, as Reid made compromises that Pelosi didn't make. But it is to say that you can lead your chamber in a different way when you have 40 Democratic votes you can lose, as opposed to being able to lose zero votes, and given Lieberman's behavior, having to pick up one or two from the other side.

Photo credit: AP Photo/Harry Hamburg.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/12/harry_reids_results.html


It's so easy to throw stones at Congress and the White House from outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. lol, it sure is. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because the story doesn't match the collective narrative of DU, I'm sure someone will claim...
that there's a "hidden hand" that lead to this COMPLIMENTARY framing of Harry Reid.

Right. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC