Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The first negotiation demand should have been give up pre-existing conditions and the....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:36 PM
Original message
The first negotiation demand should have been give up pre-existing conditions and the....
ability to drop anyone or else your Anti-trust exemption is history.

Then...no Public Plan = No Mandate.

Instead they gave away everything before they even got to the bargaining table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. This bill eliminates pre-existing conditions and their ability to drop people. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. BUT>>>it does not preclude them from charging HUGE premiums for that coverage.
So, effectively it does not do as advertised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Actually it does. What it does not preclude is charging EVERYBODY HUGE premiums for that coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And that is somehow better???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Of course not. Did I say it was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No , you did not!!!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. No, the bill mandates mostly community rating.
They can adjust rates based on your location, the size of your family, your age (unfortunately), but they cannot adjust premiums or refuse to enroll you based on medical conditions.

This alone is a very good thing. It's still in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. And charging older people THREE times as much for SHIT--
--makes the whole thing worthless for my age demographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They can drop coverage after a certain amount is spent each year.
From what I've been able to gather, the annual cap still remains in the bill. That means people with devastating illnesses can be forced to wait on treatment until the next year. Not good, as that's life or death in many situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It is supposed to be fixed, but I will wait until I see something definitive to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I heard the White House asked for this to be addressed, but according to
everything I've seen so far, it's still in there. Premiums would be too high otherwise, since there's no competition and no cost control either.

A real piece of crap bill. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Eliminating pre-existing conditions is something that is generally agreed on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. In this bill they can STILL charge you a LOT more if you have ..
a pre-existing condition. A LOT more. A lot more if you are older, a LOT more if you have the audacity to USE the coverage, true, they can not deny you the privilege of buying a policy, but it does not have to be affordable. And remember there is still a CAP on annual claims. All this shit pile does is strengthen the Industry's hold on our lives, using tax payer dollars to do it. But, it fills ALL of President Obama's "criteria" . That say's alot .....about Obama's "criteria". KILL THIS BILL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popular Front Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I support Obama's bill
Health care for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ..It is not that at all.
you need to read more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popular Front Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes it is.
I do read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. hopeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popular Front Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Talking about the Republicans and their corporate allies? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Seriously. How much are you being paid? You are not answering questions. Just
repeating propaganda. Reinforcing propaganda without debate is not likely to work here. Moreover, your talking points are highly offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Lol! Living in fantasy land?
Look!! There's Santa and the Easter Bunny riding unicorns!!! :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. This was by design
These are politicians at the national level, they KNOW how to negotiate.

In fact, they know how to do it so well that they can game the opening round to make sure the last round gets exactly what they want.....more corporate profits.

Anyone who buys the idea that the Democrats are naive on this is a mark. The kabuki theatre was for your benefit, and it apparently worked.

Single payer advocates knew this was to be outcome the second we were not invited to the table. The Democrats knew that by asking for single payer that the public option would go through....so they scrapped single payer and started with the public option.

...and now you have Leibercare, AS INTENDED.

Doubt me? Just look at who got all of the health insurance money in the last election cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is like coming up with a strategy for the Washington Generals to beat the Harlem Globetrotters.
It 'aint the strategy, it's that they 'aint playing to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. "they gave away everything"
No, they took away everything. They are on that side.

There's just no room left for benefit of the doubt: The Democratic Party is helping the pukes screw us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC