Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Romm says Obama's hold on smog reform worse than Bush administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:50 PM
Original message
Joe Romm says Obama's hold on smog reform worse than Bush administration
http://current.com/shows/countdown/videos/joe-romm-says-obamas-hold-on-smog-reform-worse-than-bush-administration

Countdown Staff
September 2, 2011 at 9:46 pm

Keith and Joe Romm, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, discuss Obama's decision to scuttle new, tighter pollution regulations until 2013, sticking with the ones his own EPA director called "legally indefensible" just last month. "This is worse than what the Bush administration wanted to do on air pollution," Romm says.

:shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. A copy of the LETTER that President Obama asked Sunstein to send to the EPA

Letter: http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/USEOPWHPO/2011/09/02/file_attachments/56091/Letter.pdf

And additional info regarding what Obama HAS done for our environment:
Cleaner Air and a Stronger Economy – A Record of Success
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/09/02/cleaner-air-and-stronger-economy-record-success


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That letter might carry more weight if Obama signed it himself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It was Sunstein's job to send the letter and to send the rule back, not Obama's. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sunstein can draft, but real weight comes with the person who signed it. I disregard
letters all the time when they are signed by an underling. It tells me that whomever is in charge doesn't have the time sign their name, then they don't really care about what it says and can't be bothered to really care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You have to be kidding right?
Cass Sunstein is the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

Do you think that The President should sign every letter that Hillary over at the State Dept or Holder at the DOJ, etc sends out?

There would not be enough hours in the day for Obama to personally sign everything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm sure there are letters that Hillary does have the president sign. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. That's your excuse?
:rofl: :rofl:

Failure of objectivity is complete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm not making excuses, just stating an opinion. Not sure what your little laugh emote is suppose
to represent. This policy could have dire consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Obama Derangement Syndrome is obvious here
This policy does not have dire consequences. It is decision number 456,588 for a Presidential Administration. It is simply being used here for Derangement Syndrome symptom #3,554,443.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. You're right, clean air is overrated. It's not like we need it to live or anything. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'd like to point out that you just proved my point in post #5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, you're happy with the decision.
Edited on Sat Sep-03-11 06:27 PM by Mass
Because, this time, this is not the fault of the GOP. They have no say in this decision. Obama decided to let people down for no good reasons (except may be to follow Cantor's lead with his no regulation job creation). And we should not care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. How can he not give a shit
about clean air. He has two kids. They are the ones who will reap what he is sowing with a decision like this. This is cold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's what I never understand about the rightwingers either - they
all have kids and grand kids that will be affected by pollution, climate change, lack of safety standards, etc. How do they not realize that future generations of their own family will be harmed by their regulation-free utopia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Obama does give a shit. You'd know that if you looked at his record regarding the environment.
Check out the TWO links in the OP on the link below:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x761735

and also the LETTER in comment #1 on the link above.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, because this is great for conservation
:sarcasm:

Expand access to places to hunt and fish

Administration advances land program created under Bush

Updated: Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 | By Louis Jacobson

During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama promised to "support the Open Fields Incentives legislation that provides incentives to farmers and ranchers who voluntarily open their land to hunting, fishing and other wildlife-related activities."

Open Fields is a provision inserted into the 2008 Farm Bill that passed Congress and was signed by President George W. Bush. It offers financial assistance to states that run voluntary programs to encourage private landowners to allow public access to their land. It also requires participating landowners to use best practices for fish and wildlife management.

From the website you posted : http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/284/expand-access-to-places-to-hunt-and-fish/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. he's getting his advice from repukes on the golf course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC